Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
137 <br /> ti <br /> a. A motion to either affirm or reject the recommendation of the Planning Board <br /> concerning the application's compliance with the provisions of Section(s) 2.2 and <br /> 2.7.3 of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance as detailed within <br /> Attachment 6 of the abstract package. Second. Vote. <br /> NOTE — if the motion is to reject, meaning the BOCC does not agree the <br /> applicant has demonstrated compliance with the specific provision of the UDO, <br /> the individual making the motion will need to provide some explanation justifying <br /> the finding that the applicant has not established, through competent material and <br /> substantial evidence,the project is in compliance with the UDO. <br /> b. A motion to either affirm or reject the recommendation of the Planning Board <br /> concerning the application's compliance with the provisions of Section 2.7.5 of <br /> the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance as detailed within <br /> Attachment 6 of the abstract package. Second. Vote. <br /> NOTE — if the motion is to reject, meaning the BOCC does not agree the <br /> applicant has demonstrated compliance with the specific provision of the UDO, <br /> the individual making the motion will need to provide some explanation justifying <br /> the finding that the applicant has not established, through competent material and <br /> substantial evidence,the project is in compliance with the UDO. <br /> c. A motion to either affirm or reject the recommendation of the Planning Board <br /> concerning the application's compliance with the provisions of 7.14.2 (B) of the <br /> Orange County Unified Development Ordinance as detailed within Attachment 6 <br /> of the abstract package. Second. Vote. <br /> NOTE — if the motion is to reject, meaning the BOCC does not agree the <br /> applicant has demonstrated compliance with the specific provision of the UDO, <br /> the individual making the motion will need to provide some explanation justifying <br /> the finding that the applicant has not established, through competent material and <br /> substantial evidence,the project is in compliance with the UDO. <br /> d. A motion to either affirm or reject the recommendation of the Planning Board <br /> concerning the application's compliance with the provisions of 5.15.6 of the <br /> Orange County Unified Development Ordinance as detailed within Attachment 6 <br /> of the abstract package. Second. Vote. <br /> 11 <br />