Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-20-2012 - 5a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Agenda - 11-20-2012 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 11-20-2012 - 5a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/16/2012 3:40:24 PM
Creation date
11/16/2012 3:40:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/20/2012
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5a
Document Relationships
Minutes 11-20-2012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
21 <br /> 1 progress in gaining federal and state financial support for the LRT project in the Plan during the <br /> 2 four years following execution of this Agreement and to incorporate these benchmarks and <br /> 3 timeline into the Plan during the first four year review and to use these benchmarks and <br /> 4 timeline in the reviews set out in paragraph 9 above and in paragraph 13 below. <br /> 5 <br /> 6 11. In preparation for the full Plan review set out in paragraph 9 above,TTA will <br /> 7 convene a Staff Working Group ("SWG") made up of a voting member and an alternate <br /> 8 member from each of the three Parties. The Orange County Manager shall designate the <br /> 9 member and alternate from Orange,the Planning Manager of DCHC shall designate the <br /> 10 member and alternate from DCHC, and the TTA General Manager shall designate the member <br /> 11 and alternate from TTA. These SWG members and alternates shall work collaboratively in <br /> 12 developing and preparing the respective report to the Parties. The SWG may also meet from <br /> 13 time to time as they deem useful to discuss developments and status of the various transit <br /> 14 projects and services under the Plan and to give TTA comments and feedback on the draft <br /> 15 annual reports referenced in paragraph 4 above. <br /> 16 <br /> 17 12. If any meeting of the SWG has local urban, rural or regional bus service in Orange <br /> 18 County as a part of its agenda,then representatives from CHT, OPT, other bus transit providers <br /> 19 in Orange County, and from the towns of Hillsborough and Mebane shall be invited to <br /> 20 participate in the meeting. The SWG members shall work openly and collaboratively with <br /> 21 these other parties in considering the status and impacts of possible bus service changes to the <br /> 22 Plan. The SWG members and the other parties shall strive to reach consensus <br /> 23 recommendations for any changes in bus services provided under the Plan in light of their <br /> 24 shared interest in maximizing the effective use of scarce transit funding <br /> 25 <br /> 26 13. Eight years after the date of execution of this Agreement, the Parties agree to <br /> 27 assess if the New Starts application for the LRT project in the Plan is still in the federal pipeline <br /> 28 for New Starts rail projects and making reasonable progress to receive federal funding and <br /> 29 whether the LRT project remains under consideration for state funding. If either funding <br /> 30 opportunity is no longer available the Parties agree to work collaboratively to develop an <br /> 31 Alternative Bus and Rail Investment Plan which reflects this fact and sets out revised funding <br /> 32 for transit projects and services. <br /> 33 <br /> 34 14. Recommendations for change to the Plan may be made by a Party to this <br /> 35 Agreement or by any Orange County resident,group or organization. Recommendations for a <br /> 36 change or revision shall be submitted to the General Manager of TTA, who shall forward the <br /> 37 recommendation to the SWG for its review, consideration and advice. The SWG shall fully <br /> 38 consider any recommendation for change in the Plan and report back to the Parties. The <br /> 39 report of the SWG shall include its opinion on the recommended change along with the <br /> 40 recommendation itself. In the event that the three SWG voting members cannot agree on a <br /> 41 shared opinion of any recommended change,then both majority and minority perspectives on <br /> 42 the recommended change may be provided to the Parties. Additionally, any citizen or group <br /> 43 may submit its opinion on the recommended change to the Parties as well. <br /> 44 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.