Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-20-2012 - 5a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Agenda - 11-20-2012 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 11-20-2012 - 5a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/16/2012 3:40:24 PM
Creation date
11/16/2012 3:40:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/20/2012
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5a
Document Relationships
Minutes 11-20-2012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
14 <br /> 1 <br /> 2 <br /> 3 Item 7e-Transit Interlocal Implementation Agreement- Paragraph 10 <br /> 4 PROPOSED CLARIFICATION FROM COMMISSIONER GORDON <br /> 5 <br /> 6 Tonight's meeting agenda includes item 7-e concerning the Transit Interlocal Implementation <br /> 7 Agreement. <br /> 8 <br /> 9 1 will be proposing the addition of some clarifying language to Paragraph 10 which deals with <br /> 10 benchmarks. <br /> 11 <br /> 12 1 have asked the County Attorney about this clarification and he told me the additional language <br /> 13 was fine with him. <br /> 14 <br /> 15 INFORMATION ON PARAGRAPH 10 <br /> 16 <br /> 17 Paragraph 10 states that benchmarks will be developed for inclusion in the transit plan, and <br /> 18 when that will happen. However, it does not clearly state how and when the benchmarks will <br /> 19 actually be used. <br /> 20 <br /> 21 Therefore, tonight I propose that we add the following language to the end of paragraph 10: <br /> 22 <br /> 23 "and to use these benchmarks and timeline in the reviews set out in paragraph 9 above and in <br /> 24 paragraph 13 below." <br /> 25 <br /> 26 (Paragraph 9 refers to the four year reviews and Paragraph 13 refers to the eight year review.) <br /> 27 <br /> 28 PARAGRAPH 10 WOULD THEN READ AS FOLLOWS: <br /> 29 <br /> 30 The Parties agree to develop appropriate benchmarks and timeline to evaluate progress in <br /> 31 gaining federal and state financial support for the LRT project in the Plan during the four years <br /> 32 following execution of the Agreement, to incorporate these benchmarks and timeline into the <br /> 33 Plan during the first four year review, and to use these benchmarks and timeline in the reviews <br /> 34 set out in paragraph 9 above and in paragraph 13 below. <br /> 35 <br /> 36 <br /> 37 A motion was made by Commissioner Gordon, seconded by Commissioner Yuhasz to <br /> 38 approve the changes in the agreement as proposed above. <br /> 39 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 40 <br /> 41 Frank Clifton made reference to paragraph 7 in the light pink handout. He said that <br /> 42 Chapel Hill Transit has some concerns and these are included in the orange handout that he <br /> 43 had prepared. The handout is shown below. <br /> 44 <br /> 45 BUS SERVICE REVENUE SHARING PROPOSAL (New Services and Support for Existing <br /> 46 Services) <br /> 47 October 2, 2012 <br /> 48 Assumptions for clarification: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.