Orange County NC Website
18 <br /> 1 Chair Pelissier said that when this was discussed in June the Board agreed in concept, <br /> 2 but this is for final approval. <br /> 3 <br /> 4 Commissioner Gordon asked if the Town of Carrboro was in agreement with the criteria. <br /> 5 Lucinda Munger said that the Town Manager would prefer that the Board of County <br /> 6 Commissioners vote on this first, but staff has not heard of any problems or objections. <br /> 7 Commissioner Jacobs made reference to a grammatical change on page 4. He <br /> 8 suggested referring to vision plans instead of planning tools. <br /> 9 Commissioner Jacobs made reference to "site conditions, allowances, and constraints" <br /> 10 and said to write out what C and A mean. <br /> 11 The Board agreed with the suggested changes. <br /> 12 Commissioner Gordon said that she does not feel the need to add brown field vs. green <br /> 13 field and Commissioner Jacobs said that in his mind it means that the County is weighing those <br /> 14 two values as one of the decision points. <br /> 15 Commissioner Gordon said that it would be all right. <br /> 16 <br /> 17 A motion was made by Commissioner Hemminger seconded by Commissioner Jacobs <br /> 18 to: <br /> 19 1. Approve the attached Southern Branch Library Locational Criteria; and <br /> 20 2. Authorize the Chair to send a letter to the Town of Carrboro that: <br /> 21 a. Transmits the Board-approved locational and site selection criteria to the <br /> 22 Town, with changes and <br /> 23 b. Requests that the Town initiate public solicitation and review of properties for the <br /> 24 southern branch of the Orange County library property based on the approved criteria. <br /> 25 <br /> 26 Commissioner Gordon said that there is nothing about costs of construction. It might <br /> 27 cost more to construct something on a brown field. She suggested saying something about <br /> 28 costs. <br /> 29 Frank Clifton suggested adding the words "cost per site acquisition and construction." <br /> 30 Commissioner Gordon agreed. <br /> 31 Commissioner Hemminger and Commissioner Jacobs agreed with this amendment. <br /> 32 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 33 <br /> 34 Chair Pelissier suggested that the letter ask Carrboro how to share costs for permits <br /> 35 and expediting rezoning. She suggested including this in the correspondence to Carrboro. She <br /> 36 would also like the correspondence to provide some explanation of the responses to the <br /> 37 suggestions. This is a way to acknowledge that the County understood the comments and the <br /> 38 concerns are going to be addressed. <br /> 39 A motion was made by Commissioner Hemminger, seconded by Commissioner Jacobs <br /> 40 to accept the friendly amendment made by Chair Pelissier. <br /> 41 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 42 <br /> 43 b. Burlington-Graham and Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro Metropolitan <br /> 44 Planning Organization Boundaries <br /> 45 The Board considered receiving information, providing direction, and/or a <br /> 46 recommendation on Metropolitan Planning Organization Boundaries within Orange County <br /> 47 pending the September 20, 2012 discussion with the City of Mebane. <br /> 48 Comprehensive Planning Supervisor Tom Altieri introduced Abigaile Pittman, <br /> 49 Transportation and Land Use Planner. He made reference to the background information in the <br /> 50 agenda packet. The overview of MPOs and RPOs began on page 8 of the packet. He then <br />