Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
48 Article 3: Base Zoning Districts <br /> Section 3.7: Economic Development Districts <br /> i • i •� <br /> Lot size,min.,per use No requirement[1] <br /> (square feet) <br /> quirer�n' [1] <br /> E k , <br /> A 77 a +r+ra <br /> Buildings/ 25 <br /> Structures <br /> Front Setback from Vehicle Use <br /> ROW,min.(feet) Areas, <br /> Storage 10 <br /> Areas Signs <br /> The purp6se of the Economic Development Eno Higher Intensity <br /> (EDE-2)District Is to provide locations for a range of light Indusu iai, <br /> distribution,retail,office,and services uses in the designated Eno d � se, <br /> Economic Development District. t�set x2I "' <br /> Ana <br /> Buildings/ 25[2] <br /> Structures <br /> Rear Setback,min. Vehicle Use <br /> {feet} Areas, 10[2] <br /> Storage <br /> Areas Signs <br /> This district will usually be app}ied where the following conditions D` <br /> exist ._ a• " )0 <br /> Bet <br /> 1. Site is located within the designated Eno Economic Development Setbacks between <br /> District. Buildings, min.(feet) 20 <br /> 2. Urban services,such as water and sewer mains,are highly <br /> desirable,but not required if acceptable alternatives are available. <br /> Any proposed use having reasonable access to water or sewer HeI9 <br /> systems shall be required to connect to the systems regardless of <br /> the availability of acceptable alternatives. <br /> °$Floor Area Ratio, R NR[4] s5 <br /> DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS NOTES: max <br /> [1]Evaluated as part of the Site Plan review process. NR-CU 75 <br /> [2]Required side and rear setbacks adjacent to residentially zoned Reported Opel SraCe <br /> land shall be equal to the required side or rear setback of the <br /> Ftatles, <br /> adjacent residential district. Required Livability <br /> [3]Two feet of additional height shall be allowed for one foot Space Ratio,min. R--CU 45 <br /> increase of the required front and side setbacks. <br /> [4]R=residential,NR=non-residential,CU=conditional use.47 Gross.Land,Area, <br /> min: rthax _? none <br /> s uare feed <br /> 46 Staff is suggesting the height limit be increased. 60 feet is already the allowable height limit in some of the <br /> Hillsborough EDD districts. <br /> 47 This is a necessary addition if the ratios are added as shown. <br /> 46 The ratios are suggested to be added because staff is suggesting that the ratios used to regulate development in the <br /> EDDs be the same types of ratios used in the other zoning districts. See Footnote pertaining to Section 6.3.1(D)for <br /> additional explanation. <br /> Orange County,North Carolina—Unified Development Ordinance Page 3-50 <br />