Browse
Search
Minutes - 20070524
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2007
>
Minutes - 20070524
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 1:28:26 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 2:51:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/24/2007
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 05-24-2007-1
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2007\Agenda - 05-24-2007
Agenda - 05-24-2007-2
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2007\Agenda - 05-24-2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
new legislation with the state that allows the County to creatively interact with the <br />developer to set the conditions of development. <br />Brian Ferrell said that this is a new tool that the legislature has given to counties <br />for developments that are aver 25 acres in size. It gives flexibility for the municipality <br />and the developer to get together and come up with a plan for development. <br />Commissioner Jacobs asked if the plan was still to convert residential densities <br />to non-residential square footage/units, etc. Craig Benedict said that the focus was to <br />start with a residential to residential. The goal is to have the simplest of programs to <br />start with, and a conversion program could happen later. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said that, as a participant on the TDR Task Force, <br />conversion to non-residential was a big component of what they were trying to do. <br />Before he would be willing to transfer units into an economic development district, he <br />would want to see the reasoning by the attorneys about why the non-residential <br />conversion could not be done first. Otherwise, he does not see the point. <br />Craig Benedict introduced Lisa Murphy with the Berger Group. <br />Lisa Murphy said that the main reasoning for not tackling residential to <br />commercial conversion right now is that, in order to get the incentives in place, they have <br />to fully understand what they are doing. <br />Craig Benedict said that they are not foregoing the opportunities to have the non- <br />residential conversion, but just trying to make sure there is a very tight line during the <br />conversion process. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said that, even in a mixed use, unless the amount of <br />residential is limited, it would be wasting the limited amount of water and sewer capacity. <br />Craig Benedict said that, part of the incentive system is if the economic <br />development areas have all of the intensity given to them by right in the existing zoning <br />code, then there is no incentive for them to ask for more. This is the one issue that is <br />being discussed with the consultant and Attorney's Office. <br />Commissioner Jacobs made reference to Receiving Area Credit Calculation, <br />Additional Credits, and said that there should be additional credit for minimal land <br />disturbance. <br />With no further items to discuss, the meeting was adjourned at 9:04 PM. <br />Moses Carey, Jr., Chair <br />Donna S. Baker <br />Clerk to the Board <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.