Browse
Search
Minutes - 20070524
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2007
>
Minutes - 20070524
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 1:28:26 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 2:51:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/24/2007
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 05-24-2007-1
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2007\Agenda - 05-24-2007
Agenda - 05-24-2007-2
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2007\Agenda - 05-24-2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Laura Blackmon said that there is a lot of uncertainty with the lottery proceeds. <br />Also, the projection last year far the monies received in the current fiscal year was $2.8 <br />million, and the proceeds will only be $2 million. Budgeting in arrears means that the <br />County will collect the money for one year but not budget it. It will be budgeted the <br />fallowing year. <br />Commissioner Jacobs asked about page 5 and the $59 million of new debt. He <br />asked how much was for the two schools and Durham Tech. Budget Director Donna <br />Coffey said $36 million - Carrboro High School gets $9 million, Elementary #10 gets $24 <br />million, and Durham Tech gets $3 million. <br />Commissioner Jacobs asked if the County Commissioners would receive <br />scenarios going down to a zero budget increase and it was answered yes. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said that the Board adopted a policy a while ago that the <br />target for school spending was to be 48.1 °fo and the current calculation is 47.9°~. Donna <br />Coffey said that the support for outside agencies is not included, and this would take it <br />right above 48.1 %. <br />Commissioner Jacobs pointed out that, of the $59 million in new debt, about 61 °k <br />is for schools. <br />Chair Carey asked for clarification for the public on the $800,000 in fair funding <br />for schools and Donna Coffey said that it is split 50-50 between the two school systems. <br />Commissioner Jacobs asked why each school system is asking for a nursing <br />position through their budgets instead of proposing that it be funded through this <br />mechanism, which is outside the per pupil. Laura Blackmon said that she has not talked <br />to the schools about this. She will make sure that this will be included in the <br />presentation on June Stn <br />Chair Carey said that there will be two public hearings and five work sessions on <br />the budget. <br />BREAK (for broadcast equipment breakdown) <br />1. Proposed Jordan Lake Nutrient Management Rules <br />Environment and Resource Conservation Director Dave Stancil said that though <br />this is still years away, there are some very important decision paints coming up this <br />summer related to the new rules for Jordan Lake Watershed, particularly the Upper New <br />Hope arm of the lake. This affects southeastern Orange County. He said that the <br />opportunity to provide comment on this might expire over the summer break. He <br />introduced Syd Miller, Water Resources Program Director for Triangle J Council of <br />Governments. <br />Syd Miller shaved a map of the Jordan Lake Watershed. In the Upper New <br />Hope arm, the largest reduction in nutrients is proposed - 35°~ reduction in nitrogen and <br />5% reduction in phosphorous. There are 12 rules that have been proposed. One of the <br />most significant rules is the existing development rule and the new development rule. <br />There will be very stringent controls on new development. For existing development, <br />there will be three years to do a feasibility study and implementation plan to figure out <br />how to reduce the current loading. The rules were approved by the EMC at the March <br />meeting. The Division of Water Quality is working with the Governor's Office to package <br />it so that it can be in the June 15, 2007 NC Register, and then there will be a 60-day <br />comment period. After the comment period, there will be a Public Hearing Officer's <br />Report. Then it will be seen by the Rules Review Commission, and most likely the NC <br />General Assembly will consider the entire package. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.