Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-19-2012 - C3
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Agenda - 11-19-2012 - Quarterly Public Hearing - Late
>
Agenda - 11-19-2012 - C3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/12/2012 10:34:21 AM
Creation date
11/12/2012 10:34:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/19/2012
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
C3
Document Relationships
Minutes 11-19-2012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ORANGE COUNTY <br />BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AND <br />PLANNING BOARD <br />QUARTERLY PUBLIC HEARING <br />ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT <br />Meeting Date: <br />November 19, 2012 <br />Action Agenda <br />Item No. <br />C3 <br />SUBJECT:Amendments to Unified Development Ordinance Text –Incorporate Changes <br />Suggested by MuniCode(UDO/Zoning 2012-15) <br />DEPARTMENT:Planning and InspectionsPUBLIC HEARING: (Y/N)Yes <br />ATTACHMENT(S):INFORMATION CONTACT: <br />1.Comprehensive Plan/Future Land Use Perdita Holtz,Planner III, 919-245-2578 <br />Map and Unified Development Ordinance John Roberts, County Attorney, 919-245-2318 <br />(UDO) Amendment Outline Form Craig Benedict,Planning Director, 919-245- <br />(UDO/Zoning-2012-15)2592 <br />2.Amendment Packet <br />PURPOSE: <br />To hold a public hearing on Planning Director initiated text amendments to the <br />Unified Development Ordinance to incorporate changes suggested by MuniCode, a corporation <br />retained by Orange County to codify the County’s ordinances. <br />BACKGROUND: <br />As part of the codification processfor all Orange County Ordinances, MuniCode <br /> <br />has completed a legal review of the UDO. As a result, MuniCodehas suggested a number of <br />corrections/updates to State statute/rule references. Except for the change suggested in Section <br />6.16.4,the changes are not substantive but the text amendments must go through the normal <br />amendment process since the UDO does notallow for manifest errors to be corrected without a <br />formal amendment. <br />The language change suggested in Section 6.16.4in regards to the requirement for an <br />environmental impact statement is being proposed because §113A-8(b) of the North Carolina <br />General Statutes states that major development projects for which an environmental impact <br />statement (EIS) is required by a Federal or State agency shall be exempt from EIS submittal <br />requirements of a local government. However, since the local government can requirethat the <br />applicant submit a copy of the EIS submitted to the Federal or State agency, staff is suggesting that <br />said EIS may be required. <br />Attachment 1contains additional informationand analysis on these amendments and Attachment 2 <br />contains the proposed amendments in a “track changes” format(red text for proposed text and <br />red strikethroughfor proposed deletions).Unless otherwise noted on a page, only pages with <br />proposed changes are included. <br />Notification Procedural Requirements <br />Legal ads for the public hearing were placed in a newspaper of general circulation in the county <br />in accordance with Section 2.8.6 of the Unified Development Ordinance. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.