Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-19-2012 - C2
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Agenda - 11-19-2012 - Quarterly Public Hearing - Late
>
Agenda - 11-19-2012 - C2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2013 4:58:48 PM
Creation date
11/12/2012 10:29:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/19/2012
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
C2
Document Relationships
Minutes 11-19-2012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
gMission/Scope: Public Hearin process consistent with NC State Statutes and <br />p <br />Orange County ordinance requirements <br />a. Planning Board Review <br />September 5, 2012 — Ordinance Review Committee (ORC). The ORC <br />recommended several modifications to the proposed amendment package <br />including: <br />a. Section 6.11.2 (C) to provide an exact threshold in cases where existing <br />land uses are expanding to modify /update outdoor lighting features. <br />b. Sections 6.11.3 (A) 6.11.4 (A) to expand and properly define the types <br />of luminaries prohibited for installation. <br />c. Section 6.11.3 (1) to add language allowing for the erection of <br />`celebratory lighting' versus `holiday lighting' and establishing a lumen <br />cap for such fixtures. <br />d. Revise existing language within Section 6.11.4 (A) to make it easier to <br />understand. <br />e. Include a new sentence within Section 6.11.8 explaining the rationale <br />for `minimum' lighting levels within Economic Development Districts. <br />ORC members discussed comments received by Department of Environment, <br />Agriculture, Parks, and Recreation (DEAPR) related to existing restrictions on <br />the height of athletic field lights. Members were hesitant to recommend an <br />increase in allowable pole heights but expressed an understanding of the <br />issues. It was determined additional guidance on this issue was needed from <br />the BOCC. <br />January 9, 2013 (recommendation <br />b. Advisory Boards: <br />c. Local Government Review: <br />d. Notice Requirements <br />Legal advertisement will be published on November 4 and 11 in the Chapel Hill <br />Herald and on November 7 and 14 in the News of Orange. <br />e. Outreach: <br />............... ............... ............... ..................... <br />❑ General Public: <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.