Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-19-2012 - C1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Agenda - 11-19-2012 - Quarterly Public Hearing - Late
>
Agenda - 11-19-2012 - C1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2013 4:57:39 PM
Creation date
11/12/2012 9:58:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/19/2012
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
1
Document Relationships
Minutes 11-19-2012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
To re -start a process that was begun in early 2010 but put on hiatus so staff could <br />focus on developing the initial UDO and subsequent amendments related to <br />economic development. The Efland- Mebane Small Area Plan (EMSAP) <br />Implementation Focus Group (IFG) had begun meeting to develop design standards <br />for the Efland "core" area, as recommended in the adopted EMSAP. The adopted <br />plan is available at: http: / /www.co.orange.nc.us /planning /admin EM SAP.asp <br />Additionally, before moving forward, staff needed a decision from the BOCC <br />regarding whether a sidewalk program would be pursued in unincorporated areas of <br />the county. Staff received direction at the October 6, 2011 BOCC work session in <br />regards to this issue; a sidewalk program will not be pursued at this time and <br />revisions to development regulations should reflect this decision. <br />At the June 19, 2012 BOCC meeting, the Board authorized staff to proceed with <br />developing the design standards in conjunction with the EMSAP IFG. <br />2. Analysis <br />As required under Section 2.8.5 of the Unified Development Ordinance, the Planning <br />Director is required to: `cause an analysis to be made of the application and, based <br />upon that analysis, prepare a recommendation for consideration by the Planning <br />Board and the Board of County Commissioners'. The following information is offered: <br />The proposed zoning overlay districts are consistent with the recommendations made <br />in the adopted Efland- Mebane Small Area Plan which called for design standards in <br />the "core area" of Efland. The primary purpose of the overlay districts is to provide <br />for a more village and urban style of development in an area of the county served, or <br />intended to be served, by public water and sewer systems. The affected area is also <br />designated as a Commercial - Industrial Transition Activity Node ( CITAN) on the <br />County's Future Land Use Map. It is pertinent to note that some of the zoning <br />districts allowed in a CITAN land use classification allow residential uses "by right." <br />The proposed overlay districts have been written so that the requirements will not <br />pertain to existing or new single - family detached residential uses. All other <br />residential uses (e.g., duplexes, multi - family) proposed in the overlay districts will be <br />required to conform to the requirements of the overlay districts. <br />Because County development regulations pertain primarily to areas that are not <br />intended to be served by public and water systems, which tends to result in larger lot <br />sizes and lower density, some of the County's regulations are not suitable for areas <br />intended to have denser or more intensive development on smaller lots. For <br />example, some of the land use buffer requirement in Section 6.8 of the UDO would <br />be infeasible to meet on a parcel of property that is less than 100 feet in width and <br />has an area measurement typically referred to in square feet rather than in acres. <br />However, in areas of the county slated for denser development than the outlying rural <br />areas, smaller sized lots with buildings closer together is to be expected. Therefore, <br />development regulations must be modified to reflect these physical differences while <br />continuing to strive for quality development. The proposed overlay districts endeavor <br />to encourage development while ensuring quality. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.