Orange County NC Website
identified and preserved. The collaboration work group asked that a letter be sent to the towns <br />to this effect. There has been a response from Carrboro only. <br />Dennis Whitling said that the OCS Board met with the Tawn of Hillsborough and discussed <br />this topic, and the two boards were on the same page. He said that OCS is moving forward with <br />the Town of Hillsborough on some ideas. <br />Chair Carey asked about a proposed meeting with the Town of Mebane and Dennis <br />Whitling said that there are plans to do this. <br />Superintendent Pedersen asked about next steps after they get responses and contacts <br />and who would take the lead in this process. <br />Chair Carey said that the Board has not discussed this yet. He said that once contacts <br />have been identified then Orange County staff could facilitate the first meeting with all the <br />entities. <br />Commissioner Gordon made reference to a handout she distributed at the County <br />Commissioners' meeting on March 27th. She said that the general idea of these groups getting <br />together was implemented by the Schools and Land Use Council years ago. The SLUC <br />initiated the Schools Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance. She said that she supports this <br />general idea of land banking. She said that there was a school/parks reserve fund atone time, <br />where the County Commissioners had set aside one cent on the property tax for land-banking, <br />but the Commissioners eventually stopped allocating money to it. She said that if this group <br />meets, there should be discussion about how the sites will be purchased. <br />Commissioner Jacobs suggested that OCS get with the Planning Department, who did a <br />fiscal analysis of the Collins property. The developer has not committed to any commercial <br />density, which may convert to more residential density and would have more of an adverse <br />impact on the school system. <br />Chair Carey asked the Manager and Planning Director to share this document with the <br />school boards. <br />c. Capital Funding Policy, Including Lottery Proceeds <br />Laura Blackmon said that on April 24th the Board of County Commissioners approved the <br />capital funding policy, which included the updated position on the lottery proceeds. The Board <br />decided to came back in the fall and do the ten-year capital improvement plan. The Board <br />approved budgeting the lottery proceeds in arrears for renovation projects or debt service. <br />Chair Carey said that this policy, as it relates to the lottery proceeds, has been discussed <br />in the school collaboration work group at least twice. <br />Ted Triebel said that he did not see before now that the N.C. Department of Public <br />Instruction (page two} has said that the County could request lottery funds before actually <br />spending them as long as the County anticipates making the expenditure within the fiscal year. <br />He said that he understands this to say that they are going to get funds and bank them far a <br />year, and then expend them. He asked for clarification on this. <br />Donna Coffey said that by statute the lottery commission is to make four deposits into the <br />account in any format that they want -not necessarily every quarter. She said that the County <br />can request as much money as it wants, but it will not get it until the money is in the account. <br />The funds need to be expended within the year. She clarified that the funds do draw interest at <br />the state level. <br />Several school board members asked clarifying questions, which were answered by <br />Donna Coffey and Laura Blackmon. <br />Jamezetta Bedford thanked the Board of County Commissioners for giving the school <br />boards the flexibility on how to use the funds. She made reference to page seven and the <br />construction management function. She asked if there was a fairer way to allocate funds rather <br />than the number of students. Dennis Whitling agreed. <br />