Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-08-2012 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Agenda - 11-08-2012 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 11-08-2012 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/23/2015 12:39:01 PM
Creation date
11/8/2012 12:26:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/8/2012
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 11-08-2012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
ORD-2012-047 Ordinance Amending the Unified Development Ordinance regarding review and permitting of solar arrays
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
12 <br /> 2. A question was posed if existing language was too nebulous with <br /> respect to what constitutes glare. <br /> Staff Comment: There is an existing definition of `glare' within Article 10 <br /> of the UDO that will be modified as part of this amendment proposal to <br /> address the concern. The modification will add language related to the <br /> reflection of light from an array or a glass surface as well as a lighting <br /> source. <br /> 3. A question was asked if the proposed 15 foot height limit was <br /> reasonable. <br /> Staff Comment: Both staff and Planning Board member Pete <br /> Hallenbeck, who has a solar array on his property, indicated the height <br /> limitation was acceptable. <br /> 4. Several comments were made about the proposed land use buffers for <br /> a large-scale solar array project. Board members indicated 50 feet may <br /> be too extreme and that a smaller buffer may be more appropriate. <br /> Staff indicated this can be a point of discussion during the public <br /> hearing. <br /> It should be noted that during a meeting with members of the <br /> Commission for the Environment a similar concern was expressed. <br /> 5. Board members indicated an array should be allowed anywhere on a <br /> parcel of property so long as it meets setback requirements. Board <br /> members expressed concern over staff's proposal to limit the erection <br /> of arrays to side and rear yard areas. <br /> Staff Comment: Section 5.5.1 of the UDO indicates accessory uses <br /> shall not be located in `any required front open space'. Staff was <br /> merely looking to treat a solar array the same as other accessory uses. <br /> Staff is looking for direction from the BOCC with respect to this issue. It <br /> should be noted that members of the Commissioner for the <br /> Environment expressed a similar concern. <br /> If the BOCC determines that solar arrays ought to be allowed within the <br /> required front open space, Section 5.5.1 (a) will need to be amended to <br /> eliminate the potential conflict. <br /> 6. Concern was expressed over proposed regulations over the total <br /> amount of electricity that can be generated by a solar array. <br /> Staff Comment: Staff is attempting to establish a permitting threshold <br /> for various array projects. To address this concern, and after <br /> consultation with the director, staff modified the proposal as follows: <br /> • Proposed limits for accessory solar arrays for residential land <br /> 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.