Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-24-2001 - 1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2001
>
Agenda - 09-24-2001
>
Agenda - 09-24-2001 - 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2012 10:29:07 AM
Creation date
10/30/2012 10:28:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/24/2001
Meeting Type
Schools
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
1
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r D i4w Z-0J 1J <br /> Prototype Designs <br /> One of the most important and time-consuming phases in constructing a new school <br /> occurs in the very early stages of the project - designing the facility. In its recently <br /> adopted County's Policy on Planning and Funding School Capital Projects, the Board of <br /> Commissioners encourages the use of prototype designs. A prototype design is one <br /> that is easily replicated for use on more than one project. While one school system may <br /> chose to reproduce the same school several times within the district, other systems may <br /> choose a design that has been successfully constructed in another area of the state or <br /> nation. <br /> Using a design that has been used elsewhere offers several benefits designs: <br /> • Provides access to a wide range of architects and product manufacturers that <br /> specialize in school design and construction; <br /> • Increases awareness of current trends in school designs; <br /> • Offers some flexibility to individualize a school's appearance; <br /> • Potentially results in cost savings on design fees; <br /> • Reduces time spent in the pre-planning phase thereby allowing construction <br /> to begin earlier than with a uniquely designed facility; <br /> • Offers an opportunity for planning committee to visit a school before <br /> committing to a design; <br /> • Ideally, each time the facility is replicated, there is potential to find room for <br /> cost savings or building improvements. <br /> While the use of a prototypical design does not totally limit a school system's creativity <br /> and individuality, there are some limitations: <br /> • Site restrictions, such as topographical barriers, may limit the design; <br /> • Programmatic needs may not be easily accommodated; <br /> • Cost to adapt a design may be more than the cost of a unique design. <br /> The Task Force reviewed survey results (Appendix E) from entities across the state and <br /> found that many counties have recognized benefits of using the same school design <br /> time after time. There were no negative comments received from any of the counties <br /> that have used prototypes, and for the most part, these counties have realized sizeable <br /> savings. For example, officials in Cabarrus County cited cost savings of between <br /> $300,000 and $400,000 for each re-use of a previously designed school. In Buncombe <br /> County, architects have agreed to "site adapt" previously designed plans for both an <br /> elementary and a middle school for between 2.6 and 2.7 percent of construction costs. <br /> The Task Force recommends that the Board continue to encourage both systems to <br /> pursue use of prototype designs as new projects are planned. <br /> Value Engineering and Life Cycle Costing <br /> Survey results show that three counties, Buncombe, Cabarrus and Lincoln, use "value <br /> engineering" in some manner. Both Cabarrus and Lincoln Counties have outside firms <br /> 34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.