Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-18-2001 - 9b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2001
>
Agenda - 09-18-2001
>
Agenda - 09-18-2001 - 9b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/29/2012 12:40:38 PM
Creation date
10/29/2012 12:40:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/18/2001
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 09-18-2001
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2001
ORD-2001-028 Stream Buffer Zoning Ordinance Amendments
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2000-2009\2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
f <br /> 10 <br /> 1 Gooding-Ray is opposed to exempting all#arms because of the pesticides in the water. <br /> 2 <br /> 3 It was decided that the document would,remain silent about the exemption of farms. <br /> 4 <br /> 5 Goodwin is concerned about the wildlife corridor and that 330 feet on either side of themajor waterways <br /> 6 is not usable. <br /> 7 <br /> 8 Woods said that he supports a minimum usable lot size,but he thinks it is a bad idea to not count 330 feet <br /> 9 on either side of the major waterways. <br /> 10 <br /> i 1 Barrows said that people should be notified enough to come to a public hearing if they are going to be <br /> 12 affected. Davis said that for text amendments,people are not notified. <br /> 13 <br /> 14 Benedict said that the wildlife corridors could be similar in width to the stream buffers. <br /> ' 15 <br /> 16 The board agreed that along streams the wildlife corridor would be the same width as the stream buffer. <br /> 17 In areas where the wildlife corridor is not along a stream,it will be reduced to a total of 150 feet. <br /> 18 <br /> 19 MOTION: Katz moved approval of the proposed Post Public Hearing to Planning <br /> 20 Board Ordinance as given in the Stream Buffer Zoning Ordinance <br /> 21 Amendments as revised above. Seconded by Woods. <br /> 22 <br /> 23 VOTE: Unanimous <br /> 24 <br /> 25 AGENDA ITEM#10: INFORMATIONAL ITEMS <br /> 26 <br /> 27 a. Planning Calendar-November <br /> 28 b. Next Planning Board Meeting-November 16,2000®6:00 p.m. <br /> 29 <br /> 30 Chair Allison reminded the board that he would not be at the public hearing on November 27,2000. <br /> 31 McAdams will be sitting in for him. <br /> 32 <br /> 33 Benedict indicated what would be on the quarterly public hearing-American Stone Company quarry <br /> 34 zoning and special use permit,school impact fee ordinance(Orange County system only),School <br /> 35, Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance,and subdivisions of non-residential land. The items on the <br /> 36 Economic Development District moratorium and the Pathways Preserve were taken off the agenda by the <br /> 37 Commissioners. <br /> 38 <br /> 39 AGENDA ITEM#11: ADJOURNMENT <br /> I 40 <br /> 41 With no frurther items to discuss,the meeting was adjourned at 10:15 p.m. <br /> 42 <br /> 43 Leo Allison,Chair <br /> 44 <br /> 45 Becky Butler,Minutes Preparer <br /> 46 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.