Browse
Search
ORD-2001-027 Planning - Orange County Stormwater Program Regulatory Enhancements for Lands Within the Neuse River Basin
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2000-2009
>
2001
>
ORD-2001-027 Planning - Orange County Stormwater Program Regulatory Enhancements for Lands Within the Neuse River Basin
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2012 2:42:26 PM
Creation date
10/23/2012 9:04:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/18/2001
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Ordinance
Agenda Item
8h
Document Relationships
Agenda - 09-18-2001 - 8h
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 09-18-2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
021 <br /> (2) The hardship results from application of this Ordinance to the <br /> property rather than from other factors such as deed restrictions or <br /> other hardship. <br /> (3) The hardship is.due to the physical nature of the applicant's <br /> property, such as its size, shape, or topography, which is different <br /> from that of neighboring property. <br /> (4) The applicant did not cause the hardship by knowingly or <br /> unknowingly Violating this Ordinance. <br /> (5) The applicant did not purchase the property after the effee4ive <br /> date of this July 22, 1997, and then requesting meal a <br /> variance. <br /> (6) The hardship is unique to the applicant's property,rather than <br /> the result of conditions that are widespread. If other properties are <br /> equally subject to the hardship created in the restriction, then <br /> granting a variance would be a special privilege denied to others, <br /> and would not promote equal justice. <br /> (7) The variance is in harmony with the general purpose and intent <br /> of the State's riparian buffer protection requirements and preserves <br /> its spirit; and <br /> (8) In granting the variance,the public safety and welfare have <br /> been assured,water quality has been protected, and substantial <br /> justice has been done. <br /> 2. Minor Variances <br /> A minor variance request pertains to activities that are proposed only to impact <br /> any portion of Zone 2 of the riparian buffer. Minor variance requests shall be <br /> reviewed and approved based on the criteria in Section 4.13.1 by the County <br /> pursuant to either G.S. 153A-Article 18, or-G.S. 160A A14iele 19. The County <br /> may attach conditions to the variance approval that support the purpose, spirit and <br /> intent of the riparian buffer protection program. Requests for appeals of decisions <br /> made by the County shall be made to the appropriate Board of Adjustment under <br /> G.S. 160A 388 er-G.S. 153A-345. <br /> 3. Major Variances <br /> A major variance request pertains to activities that are proposed to impact any <br /> portion of Zone 1 or any portion of both Zones I and 2 of the riparian buffer. If <br /> the County has determined that a major variance request meets the requirements <br /> in Section 4.D.I 4.E.1,then it shall prepare a preliminary finding and submit it to <br /> the Gem missienr Water QualAy Committee of the Environmental Management <br /> Commission. Pr-eliminaff f4adiegs an J . ee r-equests shall be f-evie <br /> by the GewA:nissieff w444a 90 days after-meeipt by the Dir-eeter-. Reques4s fe.- <br /> appeals ef detet:minmiens thm the fequif emefAs of Seatien 4.D.1 have not been <br /> met sha4l be ffiade te the Offiee of Administfafi;ve Heafings for-de4efmiaatien <br /> ffiade b y the D iA si off or-the appropriate B a af 4 a f Adjust-m-le-n-s-s 4 ffia a er-Q 9. 160A <br /> 388 or-G.S. 153A 345 &r-detem9nations made by the delegated leeal au4hefity- <br /> The purpose of the Gemmissie . Water Quality Committee's review is to <br /> 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.