Browse
Search
Minutes - 20061024
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2006
>
Minutes - 20061024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 1:50:37 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 2:45:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/24/2006
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 10-24-2006-1
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2006\Agenda - 10-24-2006
Agenda - 10-24-2006-3
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2006\Agenda - 10-24-2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
study would be integrated with the rural solid waste study. The intent is to be able to present an <br />integrated plan by spring 2007. <br />Chair Jacobs made reference to key decisions and asked about the process of locating <br />a landfill that would take the County's waste. Gayle Wilson said that this is all included with the <br />transfer station development process. The typical recommendation would be, as the transfer <br />station is nearing construction, the staff would go out for RFPs and try to determine who would <br />be interested and how much would be charged. <br />Chair Jacobs said that this should be programmed into the decisions because the closer <br />it gets to the landfill being full, the less bargaining power there is. <br />Jan Sassaman said that at the SWAB meeting next week, they would vote on a set of <br />principles and guidelines for selecting a landfill vendor and facilities to receive recyclables. <br />Chair Jacobs said that when the group of people went to Madison, Wisconsin, the major <br />thrust of the discussion was the relationship between the University and the local governments. <br />The people from UNC and the municipalities were struck by how much mare closely the <br />University of Wisconsin in Madison worked with the city and the county. In the discussions, he <br />suggested that one of the best places to improve the relationship was solid waste. He said that <br />he mentioned to the Chancellor that the University still has not appointed anybody to the Solid <br />Waste Advisory Board. He wants to bring the University into the circle where what is best for <br />the community is best for the University and try and find other ways to engage it. <br />a) Landfill Gas Opportunities <br />Gayle Wilson introduced Bob Sallack of Olver, Inc. Bob Sallack is performing the <br />feasibility analysis for landfill gas and he made a PowerPoint presentation. <br />LANDFILL GAS RECOVERY STATUS REPORT <br />Previous Conclusions: <br />- Based upon current electric rates, the sale of electricity alone will not support <br />development of a Eubanks Road LFG recovery project <br />- Cogeneration is required to make an LFG recovery project more attractive <br />o Cogeneration -generation of electric power and recovery of waste heat from <br />electric power generation equipment <br />o Coincident user need for electric power and thermal energy <br />o Thermal energy (heating) <br />Microturbine Technology <br />- Small combustion turbine - 25 kW to 400 kW capacity units <br />- Compact size <br />- Modular -can be brought online quickly <br />- Less maintenance -fewer moving parts <br />- Multi-fuel flexibility -can burn LFG, natural gas, etc. <br />Cogeneration Opportunities <br />- Eubanks Road Project <br />o Solid Waste Operations Center <br />o Animal Shelter <br />o Possible Transfer Station <br />o Auxiliary Site Use <br />o Elementary School <br />Carolina North Project <br />o Multi Building campus Development (8,251,000 GSF} <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.