Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
27 <br /> JUNE 26, 1996 PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES <br /> 2 Mary WWO said that with mWd to the use of existing hams cr <br /> 3 h t<m,ihat we uld be pwmiftd under G4. Stae said that what the are t5rrr>`t w buildings in the <br /> y trying to do with this <br /> 4 arraendmert is to sswre that if someone is going to build a new building, an accgssary building for the <br /> 5 P Of x ng a home occupatacn,that it be 1,000 square feet and that it twice on a residential <br /> ppearanca to try to bla d in with that area. There am provisions for existing buildings that may be <br /> 9 converted to hmn occupations in the future regardless of the appearancz of the bxuddng. <br /> 9 A motion was made by Commissioner Gordon, seconded by Commissioner Crowther to <br /> 10 rew this amendment to 11110 Orange County Planning Board for a recommendation to be returned to <br /> 11 the Board Of County Commissioners no sooner than August 5, 1998. <br /> 12 VOTE UNANIMOUS <br /> 13 <br /> 14 B PREa ONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT:ARTiCL g,g <br /> 15 STRUCTURES Z4 HISTORIC <br /> 16 Planner Mary Worts made this Presentation. Ali background Information is in the agenda. <br /> 17 This proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance would ta:b Article 8.8.24 to include historic <br /> 18 prop"as weil as,struft"s in the consider-ftO of Special Use Permits for the non-residential use of <br /> 19 historic structures. <br /> 20 1 Comniissicrer Gordon asked that this amendment be reviewed in the vortex!of a <br /> 21 modem house with historic cutbw7dhVs. <br /> 22 THERE WERE NO PUBLIC COMMENTS <br /> 23 <br /> 24 A rnotlon was made by Ccmmisssonsr Gordon,seconded by Commissioner Crowther <br /> 25 to refer this item to the Orange County Planning Board for a re=mmendation to to retuned to the <br /> 26 Board of County CCmmisxkrArs no sooner than August 5, 1990. <br /> 27 VOTE; UNANIMOUS <br /> 28 <br /> 29 C. P-ROPOSED Si19DMS*N REGULATIONS TEXT AMENDMENT-ACTCN <br /> 30 WISEQtlEiHT TO SUS�3MSON APPROVAL <br /> 31 Planner Mary M is made this Presentation. This technical amendrymm would delete the <br /> requirement in tlA SubdWsicn Ordnar=that a Planning Staff member be Present each dme a t]nal <br /> 33 Plat is m=rded in the Register of Deeds Offic s. The purpose of this provision is to insum that all <br /> 34 required auxiliary dccuments, such as Road MainWwo=Agreements and Dedarnion of Restrictions <br /> 35 aro recorded with the plat <br /> 36 <br /> 37 Register of Deeds, Betty June Hayes iradtcated she does not endorse this amendment <br /> 38 and that she wig sununit her comments in writing which%nil be included in Via agenda when it is <br /> 39 returned to ft County Commissioners for caxisidw atieon of approval. <br /> 40 <br /> 41 THERE WERE NO CITIZEN COMMENTS <br /> 42 <br /> 43 A rno8en was made by Commissioner Gordon,seconded by Commissioner Crowther to <br /> 44 refer eft MM to V*plaW*V Beard ter a reccmmendaticn to be mtumed to the Board of County <br /> 45 CCmmiasretW3 no scerW than August 5, 1990. <br /> 48 VOTE: UNANttAOUS <br /> 47 _ <br /> 49 John Uric mtta w=d On infdmat on in 1!10 agenda. Rnhasirap Ohocbes Pam J*ie3 <br /> 5d roads ceferw=ao tPoe xaf. krfertlal infCRrwd n. She vin merind the steps taken to purchase the <br /> 51 txa *tg. She gate an of the envtrenmerdat assessrment,the physical inspecsion of the <br /> 52 property,ll10 programs*At weft be oftermd WW the upfitt that WE t10 recassary with related Costs. <br /> 53 Ccmmisakmer Ga*m expressed a ecrxsrn that Vo t-_nvh nmertai Assessrnert to <br /> 54 dene by pmfessio wW and that there be enouo money for the upfrt <br />