Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-30-2012 - 2
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Agenda - 08-30-2012 - Work Session
>
Agenda - 08-30-2012 - 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2016 12:31:46 PM
Creation date
10/17/2012 12:17:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/30/2012
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
2
Document Relationships
Minutes 08-30-2012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
157
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Comprehensive Assessment of Emergency Medical Services 26 <br /> DRAFT REPORT and 911/Communications Center Operations Study <br /> to increase as payment of bills that have recently been sent out, as well as those as long as a year or <br /> more in arrears are paid. <br /> 2.4 ISSUES OF CONCERN <br /> This section discusses the significant EMS issues of concern identified during the analyses of the various <br /> data collected, the visual study of conditions found to exist, and numerous conversations and formal <br /> interviews conducted over the course of the study. <br /> The determination of whether or not an "issue" was identified as such was based on the assessment of <br /> current operations and performance discussed in subsections 2.2 and 2.3. <br /> The issues identified as being of significant concern with regards to EMS involved the following topics: <br /> • Availability of ALS Ambulances <br /> • Response Times <br /> • EMS Facilities <br /> Issue:Availability of Ambulances <br /> During 2011 ambulances were directed to "MOVE" 2,360 times from their identified staging area or <br /> location to another point in the County because; <br /> a. The number of ambulances immediately available was down to one (1) and the subject <br /> ambulance was directed to move to a location typically near the center of the County in <br /> anticipation of being able to respond in any direction the call may direct; or, <br /> b. In tracking the status of multiple ambulances, the Communications Center and/or EMS <br /> Supervisor(s) noted significant area gaps in coverage and redirected movement of ambulance(s) <br /> accordingly. <br /> The practice itself is not uncommon and is referred to as system status management; locating/moving <br /> ambulances to address the current level of coverage or lack thereof. <br /> The risk, however, of being down to one (or "no") ambulances is that the next emergency medical call <br /> that comes in to the Communications Center may not have an ambulance available to respond. <br /> Granted first responders fill a significant and vital role at this point, however, without an ambulance <br /> available there is likely no ALS level of service available and in turn no means of transport available. <br /> EMS Call Scenarios <br /> While monitoring EMS radio traffic during onsite time in the County over the months during which this <br /> study occurred, the actual call that "we are out of ambulances", or "we have one ambulance left" was <br /> heard numerous times. <br /> In an effort to understand the specific circumstances that were resulting in such conditions, EMS call <br /> logs were reviewed over several months during 2011 to identify the specific conditions that occurred <br /> and the circumstances that contributed to them. <br /> On several occasions, typically during the busiest hours of the day previously noted, a closely bunched <br /> series of calls could be identified, each call was reviewed individually, and the "dispatch" and <br /> Solutions for Local Government,Inc. 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.