Browse
Search
Minutes 08-27-2012
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Minutes 08-27-2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/24/2015 11:05:08 AM
Creation date
10/17/2012 10:31:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/27/2012
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 08-27-2012 - Agenda
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 08-27-2012 - Quarterly Public Hearing
Agenda - 08-27-2012 - C1
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 08-27-2012 - Quarterly Public Hearing
Agenda - 08-27-2012 - C2
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 08-27-2012 - Quarterly Public Hearing
Agenda - 08-27-2012 - C3
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 08-27-2012 - Quarterly Public Hearing
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
This slide denotes the site plan. You will note the land use buffer here, the 30-foot land use <br /> buffer around the perimeter of the property. Lots 23-26 will be served by off-site septic, which is <br /> in this general area of the project. We have two open space lots here, which is where the <br /> community well is proposed to be located. This area down in here where there is an existing <br /> stream, as I previously articulated to you, the County completed what we call a surface water <br /> identification inspection to not only verify the location of this stream, which is shown buffered on <br /> the site plan, but verify that the stream actually will have to be buffered in accordance with <br /> Article 6 of our land use standards. The applicant is showing a potential storm water basin in <br /> this general area that will have the storm water for the project. The storm water system has <br /> been designed for a 6,000 gallon detention basin. <br /> Within the site plan, the applicant is also showing the proposed street system that will have to <br /> be installed along the project. They have also identified areas where foliage will be installed in <br /> between proposed lots. Interior lot plantings will have to be planted in order to bring the project <br /> into compliance with Article 6 of our Unified Development Ordinance. As you will all remember, <br /> the UDO does require in between lot planting designed to preserve the aesthetic of the area. <br /> The applicant has already the trees that they are going to try and preserve to meet this <br /> requirement, and they have also identified the planting of approximately 60-70 trees that will be <br /> planted in between various lots in order to ensure compliance with the code. <br /> Our comments, which are contained throughout pages 5-11 of the abstract is that the project's <br /> density is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan of the Joint Planning Land Use Plan; i.e., one <br /> unit for every two acres of property. As contained within Attachment 3, Orange County Erosion <br /> Control has already tentatively approved the proposed storm water plan and grading plan. Final <br /> approval will not be received until the formal Erosion Control and Grading Plan is submitted for <br /> review. <br /> We also have the memorandum from Orange County Environmental Health within Attachment 3 <br /> articulating that they have found suitable soils supporting septic system development in each of <br /> the lots of these 1-22 and that the main lot to serve as the central depository for lots 23-26 <br /> appears to be sufficiently sized. They also stipulate that the community well that is currently <br /> proposed will have to be reviewed and approved by the State. <br /> We held a neighborhood information meeting on this project on August 6th. We had good <br /> attendance from local residents and the concerns can be summarized as follows. There was a <br /> lot of concern on the community well and whether or not that would have a negative impact on <br /> adjacent property. Although not mentioned here, I believe you have a copy of a letter sent to <br /> Commissioner Pelissier outlining a local residents' concern over the use and installation of <br /> geothermal wells that utilize the pump and dump system. That concern is not necessarily <br /> associated to this project, it is a countywide concern. The concerned resident has asked that <br /> the County begin a comprehensive review on whether or not there should be limits or outright <br /> bans on the use of geothermal wells, specifically focusing on pump and dump and geothermal <br /> wells in general. Given the fact that Orange County does not had a true aquifer, that most of <br /> our water resources are taken from fractures within the ground, and that by eliminating <br /> geothermal wells would help to alleviate some of the identified concerns over ensuring the <br /> availability of adequate water supply for personal use and not for the heating or cooling of a <br /> residence. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.