Browse
Search
Minutes 08-27-2012
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Minutes 08-27-2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/24/2015 11:05:08 AM
Creation date
10/17/2012 10:31:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/27/2012
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 08-27-2012 - Agenda
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 08-27-2012 - Quarterly Public Hearing
Agenda - 08-27-2012 - C1
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 08-27-2012 - Quarterly Public Hearing
Agenda - 08-27-2012 - C2
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 08-27-2012 - Quarterly Public Hearing
Agenda - 08-27-2012 - C3
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 08-27-2012 - Quarterly Public Hearing
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
rapidly, so smaller panels are able to generate more electricity. He thinks that the ordinance <br /> should be looser and able to evolve with the technology. <br /> Pete Hallenbeck said that he has a 7500 watt solar panel array for use at his house. He <br /> said that a 10 kilowatt array is approximately a 50-foot long by 12-foot wide footprint. It would <br /> stand approximately 9-10 feet tall. The 15 feet came from the fact that you may wish to raise <br /> the panels up to maintain the ground underneath. The 10 kilowatt limit comes from the fact that <br /> with Piedmont Electric, they will only give net metering if you are 10 kilowatts or less. He <br /> suggested that instead of having a kilowatt specification, then it could be the limit from the <br /> power company where there will be net metering. With regard to item `j' on page 23, he would <br /> suggest that it could be cleaned up to say that if it is not working for six months, it has to be <br /> dealt with, and if it is unsafe, it should be dealt with faster than six months. <br /> Larry Wright said that the front yard restriction does not conform to each situation. He <br /> suggested looking at this because there is a lot of property in Orange County that is rural. <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner Jacobs, seconded by Commissioner Hemminger <br /> to receive the proposed amendments as detailed in this abstract and attachments; refer the <br /> matter to the Planning Board with a request that a recommendation be returned to the BOCC in <br /> time for the November 8, 2012 BOCC regular meeting; and adjourn the public hearing until <br /> November 8, 2012 in order to receive and accept the Planning Board's recommendation and <br /> any submitted written comments; with the additional stipulation that the Board of County <br /> Commissioners receive information on the rationale behind restricting accessory uses in the <br /> front yard, and that this be part of the discussion when a recommendation comes back from the <br /> Planning Board. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> Commissioner Yuhasz suggested that the front yard issue be addressed particularly with <br /> regards to the size of the lot. <br /> CLOSED SESSION <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner Hemminger, seconded by Commissioner Yuhasz <br /> to go into closed session at 10:03 p.m.: <br /> 1. Per N.C.G.S. 143-318.11(a)(3): To Consult with the Attorney to protect the <br /> attorney-client privilege. <br /> 2. Per [N.C.G.S. 143-318.11(a)(5)] To establish or instruct the staff or agent <br /> concerning the negotiation of the price and terms of a contract concerning the <br /> acquisition of real property <br /> 3. Per [N.C.G.S. 143-318.11(a)(4)]: To discuss matters relating to the location or <br /> expansion of business in the area served by this body. <br /> 4. Per [N.C.G.S. 143-318.11(a)(6)] : To consider the qualifications, competence, <br /> performance, condition of appointment of a public officer or employee or prospective <br /> public officer or employee. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> RECONVENE INTO REGULAR SESSION <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.