Orange County NC Website
I <br />Argi1ments in Support: We were unable to identify any arguments in support of a manifest <br />error. <br />B) A rezoning is necessary because of changed or changing conditions in a particular area <br />or in the jurisdiction generally. <br />Staff Comment: We believe the information in the record thus far can be summarized as <br />follows: <br />Arguments in Support: No arguments have been made to date in support of changed or changing <br />conditions in this particular area. <br />We note that the Chapel Hill Town Council has approved the following developments within 500 <br />feet of The Homestead site (and located within the corporate Town Limits), during the past 7 <br />years: <br />Date of <br />Approval <br />June 27, 1994 <br />July 5, 1994 <br />November 13, 1995 <br />March 13, 1996 <br />March 13, 1996 <br />October 12, 1998 <br />Develo ment Application <br />Homestead Village Preliminary Plat <br />Southern Orange Human Services SUP <br />Project Homestart SUP Modification <br />Parkside Preliminary Plat <br />Homestead Park <br />United Church of Chapel Hill <br />Location <br />Southwest <br />Southeast <br />Southeast <br />Northeast <br />East <br />East <br />C) A rezoning is necessary to achieve the purposes of the Comprehensive Plan. <br />Staff Comment: We believe the information in the record thus far can be summarized as <br />follows: <br />Arpauments in Su ort: Arguments in support of this finding are offered in the applicant's <br />Statement of Justification (please see attached Statement). <br />Arguments in Opposition: To date, no evidence has been submitted indicating that this <br />development would not be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. <br />Preliminary Recommendation <br />The Planning staffs of Chapel Hill and Orange County recommend approval of the proposed <br />amendment to the Joint Planning Area Zoning Atlas_ We note that further evidence may be <br />submitted at the Public Hearing. <br />4 <br />