Orange County NC Website
assistance. She does not prefer the paved road going out the back but knows that may be necessary for <br /> the flow of traffic. She also likes the preservation of the hardwoods. <br /> Chair Pelissier said since everyone expressed a preference for Option B, in the recommendation to <br /> talk about the merits of an alternative concept plan design, she believes they all endorse having a master <br /> concept plan design. It appears Option B is where they need to go but she doesn't think they need an <br /> official motion. She told Mr. Waldon she hoped they had provided sufficient feedback for them to take to <br /> the public input session. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs said he would still like to know the difference of the paved area. Mr. Waldon <br /> told him they would get that information. <br /> Commissioner McKee responded to Commissioner Jacobs' concept of working around some of the <br /> structures and trees. He feels it's something they should consider because he sees this in commercial <br /> development all the time where they incorporate existing structures, existing ponds, and existing buildings, <br /> into their new commercial or residential development. As they're working on this, they should at least <br /> allow for the option of including the old trees around the house site and some of the other amenities that <br /> would make this a more attractive project in the end. <br /> To address those specific comments, County Manager Clifton stated that each time they get ready <br /> to build there, they'll go through a site plan analysis, a tree survey, and they'll make decisions on moving <br /> buildings. The issue of this concept plan is to take a look at these development areas and say when they <br /> get ready to build, they're going to build X number of square feet. Each of the issues and all the elements <br /> the Board has talked about will be reviewed by the Board on each building they bring forth and then they <br /> present that site plan to the Town of Chapel Hill. He does not believe the Board has laid anything out <br /> tonight that would not be included in their review of the buildings they're going to do there. <br /> Chair Pelissier thanked the Manager and Staff for bringing this to the Board. It causes them to <br /> realize how lucky they are to have this piece of property so they can consolidate and meet the future <br /> needs of Orange County citizens. <br /> Commissioner Gordon asked if they could make it so the statement she wrote out about the <br /> purpose would be included. Chair Pelissier said it would be in the record. <br /> d. Discussion Reqardinq Parkinq Provisions for the Eno River Parkinq Deck <br /> John Roberts with the County Attorney's office said the County was previously involved in litigation <br /> over differences of how the administration of the parking deck was impacting Orange County customers, <br /> employees, and residents of Orange County who needed to use it. The County had a lease agreement <br /> with the deck owners that provided access and that ultimately resulted in litigation. The litigation was <br /> settled earlier this year and in the outcome, the County acquired ownership of the parking deck. The <br /> Manager then established some administrative guidelines attached to the agenda that say how the deck is <br /> going to be run until this Board decides how it will be run. Up for consideration or discussion tonight is <br /> whether to leave the current structure in place, whether to make the parking deck a pay to park area, or <br /> whether to leave it a free parking zone. <br /> Mr. Clifton told the Board if they want to proceed with some type of pay to park, they should look at <br /> all the spaces Orange County owns and deal with it. Otherwise, they're reverting back to where they were <br /> before. The deck has gotten them significantly greater use from the public which has also increased the <br /> availability of parking in other Orange County owned locations. Mr. Clifton said this was not to rule out <br /> paying for parking at some point in the future. Necessity is not there right now but the deck was acquired <br /> during the summer break for the Board. They initiated the plan provided and have restrictions such that <br /> the County employees park on the upper level and the lower level is gated. The public uses the other <br /> levels. This has worked very well especially for the library and office building use. <br /> Commissioner Yuhasz said he has been pleased to see the number of people parking in the deck. <br /> He feels they should keep it free until there's a greater demand for parking. He asked if it was necessary <br /> to still have the arm there when people come into the deck. Mr. Clifton replied it slows people down as <br /> they're entering the parking deck and there's no separate walkway for pedestrians as that walk through <br /> that gated area. Commissioner McKee said the arm gives the impression it is still a paid deck. He <br /> suggested they put the arm in a raised position until they see if they have a problem at which time they <br /> can lower the arm again. <br />