Browse
Search
Minutes 08-21-2012
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Minutes 08-21-2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/24/2015 11:04:10 AM
Creation date
10/16/2012 3:37:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/21/2012
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
2012-442 Co Manager - Lease of the Piedmont Food and Agriculture Facility
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Contracts and Agreements\General Contracts and Agreements\2010's\2012
Agenda - 08-21-2012 - Agenda
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 08-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 08-21-2012 - 4a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 08-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 08-21-2012 - 5a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 08-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 08-21-2012 - 5b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 08-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 08-21-2012 - 5c
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 08-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 08-21-2012 - 5d
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 08-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 08-21-2012 - 5e
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 08-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 08-21-2012 - 5f
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 08-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 08-21-2012 - 5g
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 08-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 08-21-2012 - 5h
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 08-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 08-21-2012 - 5i
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 08-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 08-21-2012 - 5j
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 08-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 08-21-2012 - 5k
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 08-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 08-21-2012 - 5l
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 08-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 08-21-2012 - 5m
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 08-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 08-21-2012 - 5n
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 08-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 08-21-2012 - 6a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 08-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 08-21-2012 - 6b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 08-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 08-21-2012 - 6c
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 08-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 08-21-2012 - 6d
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 08-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 08-21-2012 - 6e
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 08-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 08-21-2012 - 6f
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 08-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 08-21-2012 - 7a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 08-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 08-21-2012 - 7b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 08-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 08-21-2012 - 7c
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 08-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 08-21-2012 - 7d
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 08-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 08-21-2012 - 7e
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 08-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 08-21-2012-11a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 08-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 08-21-2012-11b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 08-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 08-21-2012-13 (1)
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 08-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
ORD-2012-029 Fiscal Year 2012-13 Budget Amendment #1
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
ORD-2012-030 Ordinance Amending the Unified Development Ordinance - Dimensional and Ratio Standards (UDO/Zoning 2012-11)
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
ORD-2012-031 Ordinance Amending the Zoning Atlas - Woods Rezoning
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
ORD-2012-032 Zoning Atlas Amendment - Woods Rezoning
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
ORD-2012-033 Ordinance Amending the Zoning Atlas - Merritt Rezoning
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
ORD-2012-034 (Not Approved) Zoning Atlas Amendment Merritt Rezoning
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
ORD-2012-035 Ordinance Amending the Zoning Atlas to apply the Special Overlay Districts to Parcels Associated with the Orange-Alamance County Line Adjustment
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
Proclamation in Support of Arts & Economic Prosperity IV in Orange County
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Proclamations\2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-065 Resolution approving Motor Vehicle Property Tax Releases/Refunds for FY 2011-2012
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-066 Resolution approving Motor Vehicle Property Tax Releases/Refunds for FY 2012-2013
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-067 Resolution approving Property Tax Releases/Refunds
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-068 Resolution approving Applications for Property Tax Exemption/Exclusion
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-069 Resolution Requesting Transportation Funds to Reimburse the Orange Grove Fire Dept
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
have to remember this is 25 years or more out. Things can change and be adapted. He added that while <br /> they're looking at 390,000 square feet of developable area, that doesn't necessarily mean a large or small <br /> footprint or impervious surface. Commissioner McKee said he supports Option B primarily because they <br /> spent a lot of time talking about moving towards higher density, more urban style development, particularly <br /> in the urban areas, for the advantage of walkability, transportation needs, and accessibility to services. <br /> This past June, they passed and placed on the ballot a half cent sales tax in a referendum for <br /> transportation plan that focuses on higher, more urban, style development. They've been talking the talk <br /> and this gives them the chance to walk the walk. <br /> Commissioner Foushee echoed Commissioner McKee and added that Option B allows them to <br /> centralize county services onto one campus for southern Orange County. <br /> Commissioner Yuhasz agreed they need to keep in mind they don't know how much space they're <br /> going to need. If they need all the space available in Option B and they don't have Option B, then they will <br /> have to look for another place within Chapel Hill to provide those same services. That would take property <br /> away from potentially taxable property which would then become non-taxable. Commissioner Yuhasz felt <br /> if they maximize the opportunity to develop this property, they won't have to look for other properties. This <br /> is important to Orange County as well as the Chapel Hill community. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs asked what the height restrictions were by Chapel Hill for this property. Mr. <br /> Waldon said 60 feet which typically translates into four stories. Commissioner Jacobs said theoretically <br /> the square footage they want can go on smaller footprints. He asked if they were anticipating four story <br /> buildings. Mr. Waldon said it was hard to know what to anticipate but the intent in drawing these concepts <br /> in these development areas is there would be some vertical element to it so these would not be one story <br /> buildings. It certainly increases the capacity to go higher. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs suggested the design guidelines specifically indicate these will be multi-story <br /> buildings because if they're working in an urban setting, they should abandon one story buildings if at all <br /> possible. That would allay some of his concerns about what they're going to do to the property and <br /> possibly some of the concerns of the Chapel Hill Town Council about suburban style development in an <br /> urban setting. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs commented that Option B had 50,000 square feet of additional development <br /> to the southeast of Southern Human Services Center. He asked why this was not in option A. He added <br /> there is some indication it was a difficult site to build on but they're comfortable now that's a doable thing. <br /> Mr. Redfoot said it was a choice and there was no compelling reason to do that. They felt the <br /> development area needed to be more intense on B and there is some topography they have to deal with. It <br /> tails off as it goes towards the dedicated right of way but they learned through using different levels in the <br /> building, they can have parking below and building above. He agreed, however, with Commissioner <br /> Jacobs in that it could be a development area and A could go into that same location. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs also requested that sometime between the September 4th meeting and the <br /> October 16th meeting, or when the Board of Commissioners are given a formal plan, that there be a guided <br /> tour of the property so they could invite the public. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs added that in talking about minimizing impact to hardwoods on the <br /> southwest corner (on page 006), he would like for it to also say, "and other significant hardwoods on the <br /> property." He said they glossed over the existing pond and the storm water management pond is an <br /> amenity that was on the property when they bought it. It was developed with trails by the Americorp <br /> volunteers and could easily plug into the greenway system. As they tweak the property in the future, <br /> Commissioner Jacobs feels it's possible they can still build buildings where they're put around the pond <br /> and it's actually an amenity. He said one reason that road curved was because there used to be a house <br /> site there and the hardwoods there are just as mature as the ones in the southwest corner. Commissioner <br /> Jacobs said as long as they somehow take special note they want to build those into the design, he can <br /> live with B versus A, at least at the gross level. <br /> Commissioner Hemminger said she likes Option B for many of the reasons already stated but her <br /> main like is that it flows much better so people don't get trapped in the Southern Human Services parking <br /> lot. She also wants to make sure they are mindful of bus access in and out of each one of the proposed <br /> development areas because a lot of the citizens that use these services have to come by bus. As of now, <br /> you can take the bus to the front of the two buildings which is especially helpful to people who need <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.