Orange County NC Website
partner, and this company will provide any kind of loan that the County is interested in <br />and a cash donation in the tens of thousands of dollars. <br />Commissioner Gordon asked about the maximum amount of the donation and <br />Lori Taft said that it would not be in the hundreds of thousands, but they did not give a <br />figure. Lori Taft believes the amount will be something less than $100,000. This was a <br />verbal commitment. <br />Commissioner Halkiatis asked how much it would cast for one field of Astroturf <br />and it was answered $600,000-$1 million and the life expectancy is at least 15-20 years. <br />Commissioner Gordon said that she would like to start building two fields as soon <br />as possible with the $730,000 and consider the rest of the project later. <br />Chair Jacobs asked far an explanation of the cost effectiveness of building now <br />versus building it all at once. Lori Taft said that there may be some economies of scale <br />lost, but a lot has been gained to date with this concept and the pre-grading that was <br />done in conjunction with the school project. She said that overall it would cost more to <br />put the fields in two phases. <br />Chair Jacobs asked for information on the numbers to build two fields now and <br />four later versus doing it all at once. <br />Commissioner Halkiotis said that, from past experience, it would cost as much to <br />put in new fencing as it would be to take down old and reinstall it. He would like an <br />entire cost for two phases versus the entire project at once. He would like to leave this <br />project in. <br />Chair Jacobs asked about an approximate timeframe for the numbers and Lori <br />Taft said that she will bring this back on October 3rd <br />Chair Jacobs asked Rod Visser to contact the OCS Superintendent to clean up <br />the litter at the school site. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner <br />Gordon to approve the 7% annual growth rate to replace the 9% rate. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />2. County Priorities <br />Rad Visser said that this continues the discussion the Board had last fall and at <br />the retreat where the Board identified County priorities. At the retreat, they introduced <br />goals from 2002 and when they added all of them together they totaled about 70 issues. <br />As was discussed, the staff is suggesting to the Board to discuss priorities with a smaller <br />number and the staff can come back with a plan for each goal. They are trying to re- <br />instill some of the discipline of the goals process. They are asking the Board to <br />reinstitute the written goals and priorities. <br />Chair Jacobs made reference to priority #2, "Continuation of the process for <br />updating the County's Comprehensive Land Use Plan and Related Element." In the <br />abstract, and overall as a goal, this would be one of the top priorities. He said that, in <br />the next few months, there is very little that the Board will actually do other than give <br />direction to the Planning Board to work out a process and then to proceed. On his <br />notes, he associated with it the Hillsborough Strategic Growth Plan, the planning for the <br />economic development districts, and the refinement of the Efland-Mebane Work Group <br />Project. If they get to the retreat, he would say that one of the highest goals for the next <br />year would be the land use plan update. For the next few months, there are more <br />specific things that he sees as priorities that are in the same vein as land use planning. <br />Rod Visser said that he does see staff involved in this goal. And because staff <br />support will be needed far the Planning Board to move this along, he would be <br />concerned about making sure that the Planning staff does not fall behind on this. <br />