Orange County NC Website
jail, Twin Creeks, and West Ten Soccer Complex. He supports all of these and the staff can <br />figure out how to do it. <br />Commissioner Foushee agreed with Commissioner Halkiotis on moving forward. <br />Commissioner Gordon made reference to Elementary #10 and the $1.25 million for <br />water and sewer and the connector road and said that this is a small part of it. She would not <br />want to pull this off. It needs to be moved forward. Regarding the Animal Services facility <br />construction, it says at least $5 million. She would like to know what this amount would be. She <br />agrees that they need to talk more about the satellite campus green building standards. <br />Commissioner Gordon made reference to the West Ten Soccer Complex and said that <br />she did not think that there was any money left in the voter-approved bonds. She thought that <br />the $2 million had been used up. Rod Visser said that it has been allocated but not all <br />expended - $733,000 has not been expended. <br />Commissioner Gordon asked about the total cost and Donna Coffey said that the last <br />estimates that they received were between $2.5 and $3 million. Commissioner Gordon <br />questioned the financing for this and said that this needs to go on a bond referendum. <br />Commissioner Halkiotis asked the staff to put together a brief analysis of all of the <br />soccer money because he is confused. He said that if there is $733,000, then the two fields <br />should be built. The other 3-4 fields can be put on a bond referendum. <br />Chair Jacobs said that it is more cost effective to do them all atone time. Recreation <br />and Parks Director Lori Taft is supposed to be making a proposal far some private funding. <br />Commissioner Carey said that he is going to reserve his comment on each of the <br />projects until the Board talks about the debt capacity target. <br />Chair Jacobs said that this is a good segue into the next item. <br />c) Other Considerations Related to Funding School Capital Projects <br />Rod Visser made reference to page 3-A3 and the bar graphs that demonstrate the <br />additional debt capacity. <br />Chair Jacobs said that some discomfort has already been expressed about using a 9°I° <br />revenue growth rate. <br />Rod Visser suggested looking at the 7°lo growth scenario -pages 3-B1, 3-B2, and 3-B3. <br />If the Board chooses to issue all of the debt, it would have to acknowledge upfront that there <br />would be a 7.9-cent tax impact over the next three fiscal years. <br />Commissioner Carey pointed out that they also have to consider the tax impact of the <br />operational aspects of the projects. He wants to know about the tax impact of some of these so <br />that he can have a better picture. <br />Chair Jacobs said that there is a strategic plan for parks and custodial services and <br />these can be plugged in. <br />Commissioner Carey said that a 9°~ growth rate is too aggressive for him. He is <br />comfortable with 7% since it is consistent with the last six years. <br />Chair Jacobs asked Rod Visser to speak about the 15°!o debt capacity and how other <br />counties deal with it. Rad Visser said that he agrees with Commissioner Carey that the 15% <br />figure has served the County well. He thinks it has added to the County's financial strength. <br />The Local Government Commission continues to urge local governments to use the 15°~ <br />benchmark as a guideline. <br />Discussion ensued about the other counties that have a 15°~ benchmark for debt <br />capacity. <br />Commissioner Halkiotis asked for more information because only 5 of 100 counties <br />responded to the survey from Donna Coffey and of those, only 2 said that they had a debt <br />capacity policy. <br />