Minutes - 20060831 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Commissioner Halkiotis said that he was looking for the piece of CIP material that he had questions on several months ago about Gravelly Hill that shaved an extra $1 million. Donna Coffey said that this was a mistake from OCS. Commissioner Carey asked about the shaded items and Donna Coffey said that all of them are pay-as-you-go except for the CHCCS item, on column E on page 1, which are projects with alternative financing. Chair Jacobs asked about the County's Information Technology expenditures. He said that the staff was supposed to be investigating doing some imaging. IT Director Todd Jones said that they convened a group with Social Services Director Nancy Coston, Clerk to the Board Donna Baker, Janet Sparks, and Health Director Rosemary Summers. He said that they not only want to back scan the paper, but also try to resolve the issues of not creating a lot more paper going forward. They are looking at further automating for the future. There is no formal finding yet, but they could provide a report in a month or so. Chair Jacobs suggested having a report at the work session on October 24t". He said that he would like to talk to the IT Directors of both school systems about meeting with the County to look at common PC bulk purchases. Commissioner Halkiotis suggested asking Todd Jones to look at how to put together an assessment tool to figure out where there are economies and efficiencies through the use of field grade laptops. There are some serious opportunities for savings. The Sheriff is using 2.5 people and EMS is using 4 people to input data. Todd Jones said that they are now working on getting some field technology. Commissioner Carey agreed with having a report in October on this work. Cammissianer Carey asked about the extent to which the items that are going to be debt financed. He understands that many of the items are going to be pay-as-you-go, but he asked if the items that are going to be debt financed have already been incorporated into the debt structure for this year. Donna Coffey said that they would not be bringing those capital projects back on September 12t", but after the decisions are made with what will be funded with debt. The pay-as-you-go items will be brought back on September 12tH b}Analysis of Future Debt Affordability and Staff Updates on County and School Capital Projects Rod Visser said that aver the summer, staff worked to develop updated information about the County's overall general fund debt capacity. They are looking for feedback, guidance, and any questions from the County Commissioners about these specifics. They are not looking for any specific actions. He made reference to page 2 of 4 of Attachment 2 and the $67,357,023 in County and School capital projects that need additional debt service above and beyond what has already been issued. There are four options. If the County borrowed this $67.4 million, it would still be within the 15% debt capacity, assuming a general fund increase of 8-9°~. The second option relates to considering the degree to which the County might be willing to exceed the 15°~ self-imposed debt management restraint. The third option relates to consideration of deferring or delaying the timeline for certain projects. The fourth option is examining the degree to which provisions of this recently adapted legislation would provide additional flexibility (Senate Bill 2009). This is regarding the newfound ability of school boards to issue capital leases for new school construction. Bob Jessup, the County's Bond Counsel, was involved in the drafting of the Bill. Cammissianer Gordon asked why they were only listing projects for 2006-2008. Rod Visser said that they tried to focus on things that were immediate and those things that needed decisions fairly quickly.