Orange County NC Website
<br />1 <br />ORANGE COUNTY <br />BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS <br />ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT <br />Meeting Date:October 16, 2012 <br />Action Agenda <br />Item No.5-j <br />SUBJECT: <br />Electronic Medical Record/Practice Management System Replacement <br />DEPARTMENT:PUBLIC HEARING: (Y/N)No <br />Health <br />ATTACHMENT(S):INFORMATION CONTACT <br />: <br />Dr. Colleen Bridger,(919) 245-2412 <br />PURPOSE: <br />To approve the replacement of the Health Department’s Electronic Medical <br />Record/Practice Management System with the purchase of the Patagonia Health Electronic <br />Medical Record/Practice Management Systemwith existing Medicaid Cost Settlement funds. <br />BACKGROUND: <br />Three years ago, the North Carolina Departmentof Health and Human <br />Services (DHHS) required adoption of HIS (Health Information System) as the Practice <br />Management(PM) system for local health clinics. After roll-out and ongoing problems with the <br />system resulting in significant efficiency and billing losses, counties petitioned the state to allow <br />them to “opt out” of the system and purchase commercial PM systems like those used by <br />private providers and hospitals – necessarily more developed as user-friendly and high- <br />efficiency billing systems. <br />There are significant problems with the current Practice Management/Electronic Medical Record <br />(PM/EMR) billing/revenue/reporting systems.The ability to produce high-level reports isnot <br />built into the system, making strategic decision-making difficult. Currently, Health Department <br />staff working on rebilling of denied claims is over one year behind, making it difficult to catch <br />repetitive errors in a timely fashion. <br />Custom reports indicate the Health Department’sbilling efficiency is at around 40% of billable <br />charges ($355,250 payments on $711,100 claims). This short-fall is largely due to a <br />combination of (1) consistently inaccurate reporting, (2) non-existent data-checking before <br />billing, (3) inefficient re-billing of denied claims and (4) a lack of high-level reporting tools to <br />increase billing quality improvement. Bringing thebilling percentage to 70% of payments on <br />billable services (from 40%) would yield an increase in additional revenue of $210,263in year <br />two (see table below). <br />As of 2012, counties are allowed to opt-out of HIS. Simultaneously, counties are recognizing <br />the benefits of moving to electronic charting of not just the billing records (the “PM” piece), but <br />also the clinical data Electronic Medical Record (EMR).A vendor search and rating project by <br />GastonCounty, in conjunction with acollection of the state’s local health directors, vetted over <br />fifty different hospital PM/EMRs by cost and features, as measured by user surveys and <br />demonstrations. <br /> <br />