Minutes - 20060627 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Commissioner Corey's proposal was included in the agenda packet (It was also included in the April 18t" packet). This proposal also satisfies the statutory requirements and contains a district with all of Chapel Hill Township with four members, a district of the rest of the County with two members, and one member at-large. Also included in the packet were two proposed resolutions, which would both implement proposal D. There is not a resolution to implement Commissioner Corey's proposal because at the April 18t" meeting, the Board voted to include a combination "nominating district"lot-large system. A "nominating district" is one which in the primary election will only allow people living in the district to vote for candidates who live in the district. A "residency district" is one in which the candidate must live in the district, but all citizens in the county can vote for the candidate. One of the several principles that the County Commissioners adapted would have all of the people in the County voting for a majority of the members of the Board of County Commissioners. In a nominating district system, Commissioner Corey's proposal would not have all of the people in the County nominating a majority of the members. The resolutions give a choice of either having a "nominating district" system in the primary or a "residency district" system in the primary. Both resolutions call for a referendum on this new system in November. Geof Gledhill answered clarifying questions from Commissioner Carey and Commissioner Gordon. Commissioner Foushee asked if they were to apply the map from Commissioner Corey's proposal (which includes all of Chapel Hill Township in one district} to proposal D, if it would still meet the one person, one vote requirements and Geof Gledhill said no. That is because Chapel Hill Township includes two-thirds of the of the population and the rest of the county has one- third the population. Therefore Chapel Hill Township would have four commissioners, and not three as in the proposal D, to achieve the one person, one vote standard. Commissioner Gordan referred to the size of the deviations from the one person, one vote standard for proposal D and for Commissioner Corey's proposal. The maximum deviation allowed is 5 percent, and one of the districts in proposal D deviates by 4'/ percent (District 2) with the other deviating somewhat less (3°~}. In contrast, the districts in Commissioner Corey's proposal have very little deviation (1/2 °~ and 1 °~} from the ideal number of people in the district needed to match the one person, one vote requirement. Commissioner Gordon then asked whether, if at the next census if one of the districts goes over the 5 percent deviation, if the commissioners would have to redistrict. Geof Gledhill said that if, upon the new census data, one of the districts is off more than 5%, and he is still County Attorney when that happens, he would recommend redistricting. Commissioner Gordon pointed out that proposal D was closer to reaching the 5°~ deviation, and therefore closer to the necessity for redistricting. Commissioner Carey said that the reason for putting his map forward relates to the deviation and how close the initial map was to 5%. He was trying to minimize a chance for redistricting. He said that the Board had adopted several principles, including one person/one vote and making rural districts rural, while the urban districts are urban. He wanted to keep rural and urban areas separate. He said that the key issue is that the proposal D map is very close to the 5°~ deviation and therefore brings them close to redistricting after the next census. Chair Jacobs said that he worked on this with Commissioner Foushee and Commissioner Halkiotis and the Board voted for proposal B, and proposal D was closer to the spirit of proposal B than anything else they could come up with. He said that it does allow better separation of rural interests from urban interests. He said that all would be represented by the majority of the Board of County Commissioners no matter where they live. He said that Commissioner Corey's map guarantees that Chapel Hill Township will always have the majority votes. He thinks that the purpose of the citizen comment was to have more representation in the rural area of the County. That is why he likes proposal D.