Agenda - 10-02-2012 - 7d - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

73 2040 MTP and CTP Alternatives — Congestion Maps (v/C maps) Use of Congestion Maps The Performance Measures provide a eg neral indicator of the overall transportation system. On the other hand, the Congestion Maps show the forecasted level of service on specific road segments based on the average of the four-hour afternoon peak hour. These maps are sometimes called"V/C" maps (V over C maps)because the level of service, or existence of congestion, is derived by dividing the traffic volume by the traffic capacity of the road segment. For example, a volume of 9,000 vehicles on a road that is capable of carrying 10,000 vehicles will produce a V/C of 0.9. A V/C of 1.0 is equal to a Level of Service (LOS) of"E", which can be described as: Limit of acceptable delay, unstable flow, poor signal progression, traffic near roadway capacity, frequent cycle failures. It should be noted that these congestion maps show the average for the afternoon peak. The total volume for the four-hour afternoon peak period is divided by the total capacity for the same period. Thus, the V/C ratio for the afternoon peak is likely to be less than the one-hour peak, or peak-of-the-peak, often experienced by motorists. Although the term traffic congestion is subj ective in that it means different levels of delay to different people, it can be said that any road segment approaching a V/C of 1.0, which is indicated on the maps with an ��°, experiences some delays. A V/C greater than 1.0, which is indicated on the maps by the nN��:� �a��➢l��nN�, means frequent delays for the motorist and as the V/C approaches a value of 1.1 most motorists experience what might be termed unacceptable travel delays. The Triangle Regional Model (the travel demand model for the Triangle Region)uses travel behavior data for the Triangle Region, future transportation system networks, and future population and employment data, to forecast the volume and capacity values needed to produce these maps. The forecasts are for the year 2040. Each congestion map represents one of the Alternatives, which are comprised of a specific transportation network and land use scenario. Review and comparison of the congestion maps for the various Alternatives will show how well a particular Alternative addresses travel demand on the key roadway segments and corridors in the MPO planning area. Of particular importance is the comparison of any one Alternative with the E+C map (Existing plus Committed), which can be considered a benchmark The E+C map uses a transportation network with the current roadways and transit services plus any others that have been committed to being implemented, and the Socioeconomic Data (i.e., population and employment)for the year 2040. This map shows the level of service to be Congestion Maps 5-1