Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-18-2012 - 7c
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Agenda - 09-18-2012 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 09-18-2012 - 7c
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2016 10:47:37 AM
Creation date
9/17/2012 8:57:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/18/2012
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
7c
Document Relationships
Minutes 09-18-2012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6 <br /> (C) An increase or decrease in the overall project operating costs of the LRT <br /> project in the Plan of over 5%or more;or <br /> (D) An increase or decrease in the overall funds provided for bus service in the <br /> Plan of 5%or more;or <br /> (E) An increase or decrease in the funds provided to Orange,the Chapel <br /> Hill/Carrboro/UNC Partnership,or TTA for bus service of more than 5°/01 of the / Comment[PS14]:Represents+-$108,310 for <br /> CHT;+-$39,770 for TTA;and+-$19,972 for <br /> amount provided in the Plan or more than $300,000,whichever is greater. OPT. <br /> Comment[PS15]:The typical bus used by <br /> A proposed elimination or addition of any fixed guideway capital project shall be considered a CHT and TTA costs approximately$400,000. <br /> Vehicles used by OPT cost approximately <br /> material change to the Plan. $85,000. <br /> Comment[)R16]:Should the MPO not be <br /> 13.Any proposed change to the Plan that is deemed non-material shall be effective only added as a party it should still make <br /> recommendations on material changes to the <br /> upon its approval by the Orange County Manager)and the General Manager of TTA. Any change Plan. <br /> whether material or non-material must be evidenced by a written document signed by both Comment[7R17]:,the Planning Manager of <br /> Parties. DCHC, <br /> Comment[]R18]:Should the MPO not be <br /> added as a party the MPO would still have a <br /> 14.The term of this Agreement shall be from the date first above recorded to and necessary role such as the following: <br /> including June 30, 2035. Upon its expiration the Agreement may be renewed upon mutual <br /> In addition to proposed material changes to the Plan <br /> agreement of the Parties. The Agreement may be modified as needed upon mutual agreement the Parties shall refer to and seek recommendations <br /> of the Parties and may be terminated upon mutual agreement of the Parties or by either of the from DCHC for any of the following: <br /> - -(A)Goals and objectives for the LRT planning <br /> Parties upon a material breach by the other Party. Any modification must be in the form of a process;and <br /> written agreement signed by both Parties. - -(B)Optimaluse ofexistingtransportation <br /> facilities;and <br /> (C)Consistency of LRT planning with the availability <br /> of Federal,State and Local funding;and <br /> - -(D)Land use and transportation plan interplay; <br /> Understood and agreed to and effective as of the date written above, byl: and <br /> - -(E)Urban and rural route connectivity;and <br /> - -(F)Preservation of Rights of Way for future <br /> transporation needs;and <br /> - -(G)Social,economic,energy,and environmental <br /> Orange County impacts of LRT planning;and <br /> g y - -(H)Congestion mitigation. <br /> Comment[)R19]:Signature line for DCHC if <br /> included as a party <br /> .DCHC <br /> TTA <br /> Page 1 4 9/10/12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.