Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-18-2012 - 6c
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Agenda - 09-18-2012 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 09-18-2012 - 6c
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2016 9:59:01 AM
Creation date
9/14/2012 4:54:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/18/2012
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6c
Document Relationships
Minutes 09-18-2012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
13 <br /> 4. There appears to be insufficient stacking space for vehicles attempting to access <br /> the site. <br /> The drive has been widened and a 30'Radii provided. Per discussion w/Mr. Tom <br /> Altieri, Ms. Darcy Zorio and Mr. Harvey at Orange County offices on September 7, <br /> 2012, this is acceptable to address the comment above. <br /> 5. Proposed storage buildings are too close to property lines to allow for an <br /> adequate drive aisle. <br /> The buildings as shown of the current plan and the plans submitted to the BOCC and <br /> Planning Board both show a reduction in end units to allow for adequate drive isles <br /> and turning movements. A center drive isle of 25'was also added in response to these <br /> comments prior to submitting to the BOCC and Planning Board. Per discussion w/Mr. <br /> Tom Altieri, Ms. Darcy Zorio and Mr. Harvey at Orange County offices on September <br /> 7, 2012, this is acceptable to address the comment above. <br /> 6. Concerns were expressed over proposed sign locations. Staff wanted additional <br /> detail to ensure proposed signs were not located within established site triangles. <br /> Signs will not be allowed in the proposed site triangles in accordance with the approval <br /> and permitting of the driveway by NCDOT. Per the proposed locations, signs are <br /> located out of the site triangles and AASHTO Site Lines. Per discussion w/Mr. Tom <br /> Altieri, Ms. Darcy Zorio and Mr. Harvey at Orange County offices on September 7, <br /> 2012, this is acceptable to address the comment above. <br /> 7. BOCC members expressed concerns over existing, mature, foliage near the <br /> proposed entrance and asked for clarification if the existing trees would block <br /> visibility or create a hazard for large vehicles attempting to access the site. <br /> The applicant does not recall extensive discussions on the existing foliage by the BOCC <br /> members other than those comments already issued by the transportation planner.A <br /> packet of site pictures are attached to assist the BOCC and Planning Board members <br /> in getting a realization of the existing vegetation.As indicated at the meeting on <br /> August 27, access at the Right of Way will be regulated by NCDOT, however all site <br /> inspections and reviews of the existing site conditions do not reveal major concerns for <br /> Summit Design and Engineering, especially since the existing vegetation will have to <br /> be removed if deemed a hazard prior to receiving a driveway permit from NCDOT. <br /> Per discussion w/Mr. Tom Altieri, Ms. Darcy Zorio and Mr. Harvey at Orange County <br /> offices on September 7, 2012,pictures of the field conditions were provided and the <br /> entrance was reviewed in detail. Upon review, staff determined that the location of the <br /> driveway was acceptable with respect to the adjacent drive and the existing vegetation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.