Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-18-2012 - 6b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Agenda - 09-18-2012 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 09-18-2012 - 6b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2016 9:09:10 AM
Creation date
9/14/2012 4:49:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/18/2012
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6b
Document Relationships
Minutes 09-18-2012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
73 <br /> REQUIRED REVIEW: <br /> Project involves the review of a Class A Special Use Permit in accordance with the provisions of <br /> Section 2.7 of the UDO. <br /> • Decision is based on sworn testimony from applicant, supporters, and detractors <br /> • Applicant bears the burden of proving compliance with the UDO <br /> • Those in opposition to the project are required to submit evidence demonstrating project <br /> does not comply. <br /> STAFF INITIAL REVIEW: <br /> • Applicant has submitted all documentation required for the review of a proposed utility <br /> (i.e. required by Section 5.9.3) <br /> • Applicant has submitted required documentation for a Class A Special Use Permit (i.e. <br /> required by Section 2.7.3) <br /> • There are policies within the Comprehensive Plan lending credence to the viability of the <br /> proposal <br /> RECOMMENDATION: <br /> 1. Receive the application, <br /> 2. Conduct the Public Hearing and accept public, BOCC, and Planning Board comments. <br /> 3. Refer the matter to the Planning Board with a request that a recommendation be <br /> returned to the County Board of Commissioners in time for the September 18, 2012 <br /> BOCC regular meeting. <br /> 4. Adjourn the public hearing until September 18, 2012 in order to receive and accept the <br /> Planning Board's recommendation and any submitted written comments. <br /> Beth Trehos: Manager and members of the County Commissioners, Mr. Vice Chair and <br /> members of the Planning Board, my name is Beth Trehos, I'm the Attorney with Smith, Moore, <br /> and Leatherwood. My address is 434 Fayetteville St., Raleigh, N. C. I am here today on behalf <br /> of Strata Solar, who is the contract tenant of the project. As you've heard, they would like to <br /> construct a solar array on 53 acres out of the 112-acre farm. As has been explained to you, <br /> your process is a quasi-judicial one, which requires that we provide expert testimony to indicate <br /> that we have met the findings of fact that are set out in your Unified Development Ordinance. In <br /> the interest of not taking up too much of your time, we have put together affidavits of the experts <br /> that we have brought to testify before you tonight. They will summarize the testimony provided <br /> in those affidavits for you and of course answer any questions that you might have. <br /> I must apologize to you, I misunderstood and thought that this initial hearing was just the Board <br /> of County Commissioners and I thought I was arriving with an ample number of affidavits, and I <br /> find now that I don't have quite enough and I apologize to you. Mr. Harvey has indicated that he <br /> would be happy to include those in the Planning Board packet so that everybody can have a <br /> copy. I do apologize. <br /> Here with me tonight is engineer Phil Post of Philip Post and Associates, real estate appraiser <br /> Rich Kirkland, and Lance Williams of Strata Solar, as well as Beth Bradshaw, who is a <br /> representative of the family who owns the property. I will ask each of them to come forward and <br /> share their testimony with you. I wonder if it might be appropriate at this time to pass up the <br /> affidavits that we have and to ask that they be included in the record. I would of course ask that <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.