Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-18-2012 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Agenda - 09-18-2012 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 09-18-2012 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2016 9:01:58 AM
Creation date
9/14/2012 4:44:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/18/2012
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 09-18-2012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
ORD-2012-039 Ordinance Amending the Zoning Atlas - Rezoning and Class A Special Use Permit Modification – Spence Dickinson
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
ORD-2012-040 (Not Approved) An Ordinance Denying an Amendment Request to the Zoning Atlas Dpence Dickinson
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-082 Resolution Concerning Statement of Consistency of a Proposed Zoning Atlas Amendment With the Adopted Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-083 NO ACTION - Resolution Concerning Statement of Inconsistency of a Proposed Zoning Atlas Amendment With the Adopted Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment 1 4 <br /> ORANGE COUNTY <br /> PLANNING BOARD <br /> ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT <br /> Meeting Date: July 11, 2012 <br /> Action Agenda <br /> Item No. 8 <br /> SUBJECT: Rezoning and Class A Special Use Permit Modification — Spence Dickinson <br /> DEPARTMENT: Planning and Inspections PUBLIC HEARING: (Y/N) Yes <br /> ATTACHMENT(S): INFORMATION CONTACT: <br /> 1. Property and Vicinity Map Michael D. Harvey, Planner III 245-2597 <br /> 2. Resolution of Rezoning Approval Craig Benedict, Director 245-2575 <br /> 3. Resolution of Rezoning Denial <br /> 4. Special Use Permit Findings of Fact <br /> 5. Draft May 29, 2012 Quarterly Public <br /> Hearing Minutes <br /> 6. Ratio Explanations <br /> PURPOSE: To make a recommendation to the BOCC on a general use rezoning petition and <br /> Class A Special Use Permit (hereafter `SUP') modification submitted by Mr. Spence Dickinson in <br /> accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance (hereafter `UDO'). <br /> BACKGROUND: This item was presented at the May 29, 2012 Quarterly Public Hearing where <br /> staff indicated the purpose of the request was to rezone a 4.003 acre parcel of property (PIN <br /> 9871-54-9182): <br /> From: Rural Buffer(RB) and Planned Development Housing Rural Residential (PD-H-R1) <br /> To: Rural Buffer(RB) <br /> and remove the property from the provisions of a previously recorded SUP. The property in <br /> question is north of intersection of Blackwood Mountain Road (SR 2258) and Pathway Court, a <br /> private road maintained by the local homeowners association (please refer to Attachment 1). <br /> During the hearing, Mr. Dickinson indicated he was requesting the rezoning and SUP <br /> modification to remove the subject parcel from the development and zoning restrictions of the <br /> Heartwood SUP in an effort to address existing septic issues on an adjacent parcel of property. <br /> Public Hearing: During the hearing, the following comments/questions were posed concerning the <br /> application: <br /> • An adjacent property owner, Mr. Charles Lamb, indicated he had no problem with the <br /> request but wanted assurances that once the subject parcel was recombined with the <br /> adjacent property (i.e. the camp) there would be no vehicular access from that property <br /> onto Pathway Court and that the property would remain in a vegetated, undeveloped, <br /> state. <br /> STAFF COMMENT: Vehicular access would not be allowed as Pathway Court is <br /> a private road subject to the provisions of the Heartwood SUP. Only property <br /> encumbered by the Heartwood SUP can access the roadway. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.