Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-18-2012 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Agenda - 09-18-2012 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 09-18-2012 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2016 9:01:58 AM
Creation date
9/14/2012 4:44:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/18/2012
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 09-18-2012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
ORD-2012-039 Ordinance Amending the Zoning Atlas - Rezoning and Class A Special Use Permit Modification – Spence Dickinson
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
ORD-2012-040 (Not Approved) An Ordinance Denying an Amendment Request to the Zoning Atlas Dpence Dickinson
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-082 Resolution Concerning Statement of Consistency of a Proposed Zoning Atlas Amendment With the Adopted Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-083 NO ACTION - Resolution Concerning Statement of Inconsistency of a Proposed Zoning Atlas Amendment With the Adopted Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
24 <br /> RECOMMENDATION: <br /> Staff has not received any information that would establish grounds for making a negative finding on the general <br /> standards. These standards include maintaining or promoting the public health, safety, and general welfare, <br /> maintaining or enhancing the value of contiguous property, and the use being in compliance with the general plan <br /> for the physical development of the County. <br /> Staff has reviewed the application, the site plan, and all supporting documentation and has found that the <br /> applicant complies with the specific standards and required regulations as outlined within the UDO. <br /> Provided the Planning Board and the Board of County Commissioners finds in the affirmative on the specific and <br /> general standards, the Board could make a positive finding on this application. In the event that the Board of <br /> County Commissioners makes the determination that the permit can be issued, Planning Staff recommends the <br /> attachment of the following conditions to the Special Use Permit: <br /> 1. That an Ordinance approving the rezoning of the subject parcels as requested by the applicant as <br /> part of the application submittal process be approved by the Board of County Commissioners; <br /> 2. Condition 17 of the Original Special Use Permit, approved on September 2, 1986 and recorded <br /> within the Registrar of Deeds office within Book 725 at Page 306, required that the developer <br /> produce: `a final boundary survey of the Planned Development (i.e. Heartwood)'. As part of this <br /> revision the applicant shall, within 180 days from the approval of this modification, cause the <br /> production of a revised boundary survey for the Heartwood and Blackwood Mountain Planned <br /> Development denoting the new boundary line and submit it to the Orange County Planning <br /> Department for approval. This survey, prepared and sealed by a licensed land surveyor, shall also <br /> denote the revised dimensional standards for the project as follows: <br /> ORIGINAL REQUIRED REVISED REQUIRED PROPOSED <br /> MINIMUM STANDARDS: MINIMUM STANDARDS: STANDARDS FOR <br /> (Per Orange County PROJECT: <br /> Regulations) (Removing the 2 acre lot (As proposed by the <br /> from the Planned applicant) <br /> Development) <br /> Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Maximum Allowable Floor <br /> Maximum allowed — 0.058 or Maximum allowed — 0.058 or Area Ratio for project - <br /> 88,957 sq.ft. 83,905 sq. ft. 82,000 sq. ft. (1.88 acres) <br /> Minimum Required Open Minimum Required Open Minimum Proposed Open <br /> Space — 0.84 or 1,288,348 Space —0.84 or 1,215,166 Space for project - <br /> sq.ft (29.5 acres) sq.ft. (27.8 acres) 1,445,147 sq. ft. (33.17 <br /> acres) <br /> Minimum Required Livability Minimum Required Livability Proposed Livability Space <br /> Space — 0.75 or 1,150,310 Space —0.75 or 1,084,970 for project - 1,280,147 <br /> sq.ft. (26.4 acres) sq.ft. (24.9 acres) sq.ft (29.3 acres) <br /> Minimum Required Recreation Minimum Required Recreation Required Recreation <br /> Space —0.031 or 47,546 sq. ft Space —0.031 or 44,845 sq. ft. Space for project - 96,000 <br /> sq. ft (2.2 acres) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.