Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-18-2012 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Agenda - 09-18-2012 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 09-18-2012 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2016 9:01:58 AM
Creation date
9/14/2012 4:44:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/18/2012
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 09-18-2012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
ORD-2012-039 Ordinance Amending the Zoning Atlas - Rezoning and Class A Special Use Permit Modification – Spence Dickinson
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
ORD-2012-040 (Not Approved) An Ordinance Denying an Amendment Request to the Zoning Atlas Dpence Dickinson
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-082 Resolution Concerning Statement of Consistency of a Proposed Zoning Atlas Amendment With the Adopted Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-083 NO ACTION - Resolution Concerning Statement of Inconsistency of a Proposed Zoning Atlas Amendment With the Adopted Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br /> 3. The request will not invalidate existing conditions imposed as part of the original <br /> Heartwood at Blackwood Mountain Class A Special Use Permit Planned Development <br /> approval, <br /> 4. Comments received from various County agencies (i.e. Sheriff, Fire Marshal, DEAPR, <br /> Orange County Health) indicate there are no concerns associated with the request, <br /> 5. The proposal is consistent with the various goals outlined within the Comprehensive Plan <br /> concerning development, including: <br /> a. Land Use Overarching Goal: Coordination of the amount, location, pattern, and <br /> designation of future land uses, with availability of County services and facilities <br /> sufficient to meet the needs of Orange County's population and economy <br /> consistent with other Comprehensive Plan element goals and objectives. <br /> b. Land Use Goal 2: Land uses that are appropriate to on-site environmental <br /> conditions and features and that protect natural resources, cultural resources, and <br /> community character. <br /> c. Land Use Goal 3: A variety of land uses that are coordinated within a program <br /> and pattern that limits sprawl, preserves community and rural character, minimizes <br /> land use conflicts, supported by an efficient and balanced transportation system. <br /> 6. Based on staff's determination the proposed Zoning Atlas Amendment, and SUP <br /> modification, are consistent with the provisions and goals of the Joint Planning Land Use <br /> Plan and Joint Planning Agreement, <br /> 7. The submission of evidence demonstrating compliance with the provisions of Section <br /> 5.3.2 (A) Special Uses— General Standards of the UDO, and <br /> 8. A lack of competent material and substantial evidence entered into the record <br /> demonstrating the request was not incompliance with the various provisions of the UDO. <br /> Please refer to Attachment 5 for additional detail. It should be noted that in rendering its <br /> decision, the Planning Board recommended the imposition of four (4) conditions. The applicant <br /> has agreed to the imposition of these conditions in writing with the exception for condition 4 <br /> (Note: The applicant inadvertently notes condition 5 in Attachment 4 rather than condition 4). <br /> Please refer to Attachment 4 for additional detail. <br /> Planning Director's Recommendation: In accordance with the provisions of Section 2.7.4 and <br /> 2.8.5 of the UDO, the Planning Director recommends approval of the rezoning request and <br /> SUP modification with all recommended conditions, subject to the following: <br /> • Approval of the recommended findings of fact associated with the approval of the Class A <br /> Special Use Permit modification as detailed within Attachment 5, <br /> • Approval of a Resolution of Rezoning Approval authorizing the change in zoning of the <br /> property (Attachment 6), <br /> • Approval of a Resolution of Consistency with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan as detailed <br /> within Attachment 8, <br /> • The imposition of the recommended conditions (Attachment 5), <br /> • Based on the BOCC's ability to make an affirmative finding on the general and specific <br /> standards outlined within Section 5.3.2 (A) and (B) of the UDO. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.