Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-06-2012 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Agenda - 09-06-2012 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 09-06-2012 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2016 3:29:08 PM
Creation date
9/11/2012 10:34:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/6/2012
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 09-06-2012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
ORD-2012-036 Ordinance Amending the Zoning Atlas - Eno Economic Development District (EDD) Area Land Use
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
ORD-2012-037 (Not Approved) An Ordianance Denying Amendment to the Orange Co8unty Zoning Atlas for EDD
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-075 Resolution Amending the 2030 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-077 Resolution Concerning Statement of Consistency of a Proposed Zoning Atlas Amendment with the Adopted Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-078 NO ACTION - Resolution Concerning Statement of Inconsistency of a Proposed Zoning Atlas Amendment With the Adopted Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
64 <br /> 1 Matthew Edwards also lives in Weldon Ridge. He thanked Craig Benedict and the <br /> 2 Planning Board for all of the work and for changing the zoning from ED-1 back to R-1. <br /> 3 However, he is concerned with the future land use change because it sets a permanent <br /> 4 precedent. He said that his family decided to move to this area because of the rural character. <br /> 5 Robin Jacobs is the Executive Director of the Eno River Association and an Orange <br /> 6 County resident. She came to represent the Eno River Association and herself. She applauded <br /> 7 the Planning staff for modifying the recommendations that were initially made to rezone <br /> 8 property. There are some proposed changes that she thinks are unnecessary. The area that is <br /> 9 proposed to be zoned EDE-2, the more intense zone, is right next to Stoney Creek. She made <br /> 10 reference to Attachment 7-c and said that it shows the boundary of the Stoney Creek Small <br /> 11 Area Plan. This property is in the small area plan for Stoney Creek and that is why it was not <br /> 12 included in the EDD when it was zoned several years ago. It was left out on purpose. She said <br /> 13 that the Stoney Creek Small Area Plan was strictly talking about residential development and <br /> 14 there was nothing about commercial development in there at all. One of the guidelines is <br /> 15 protection of natural terrain and features and sensitive ecological areas including Duke Forest, <br /> 16 wildlife corridors along Stoney Creek, and other identified natural areas. Another one of the <br /> 17 guidelines is protection of the character of existing neighborhoods from incompatible uses, <br /> 18 densities, and direction of growth not rural in character. She pointed out one of the bullets <br /> 19 under that, which says, "no new commercial development in the planning area." This is the <br /> 20 Stoney Creek Overlay area, which is now proposed to go from Rural Residential to EDE-2. She <br /> 21 said that, in reality, there is an agreement that can legally provide for water and sewer, but this <br /> 22 will be really expensive. It means that some developer will have to acquire enough property and <br /> 23 have big enough lands to run the lines all the way into this district, or the County will have to find <br /> 24 the money somewhere. She asked about the EDE-2 at the mobile home park and if that would <br /> 25 make the current use non-conforming. <br /> 26 Blythe Ardyson has lived on Mt. Herman Church Road on 13 years. She spoke about <br /> 27 the yellow area, C. She is also concerned about the dark purple areas, A, where commercial is <br /> 28 being brought into residential areas. She said that they moved into this area specifically <br /> 29 because of the rural residential character. She knew that there were commercial centers <br /> 30 nearby when she moved here, but this would change the nature of the neighborhood <br /> 31 tremendously and would hurt the quality of life. She said that her family bikes every weekday <br /> 32 around here and this commercial development would pose a danger. She said that there are <br /> 33 underutilized or not yet developed areas with easy interstate access that are very close by, such <br /> 34 as Waterstone. <br /> 35 Janet Arvik lives in Weldon Ridge. She said that this development has become special <br /> 36 in more ways than just being small. She said that it is a mixed age community that gets along <br /> 37 well with all of the neighbors. She asked the Board to please not commercialize the area. <br /> 38 Heidi Hackney lives in Weldon Ridge. She read a letter from the Crabtree builders. This <br /> 39 letter was sent to the County Commissioners prior to this meeting. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.