Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-06-2012 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Agenda - 09-06-2012 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 09-06-2012 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2016 3:29:08 PM
Creation date
9/11/2012 10:34:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/6/2012
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 09-06-2012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
ORD-2012-036 Ordinance Amending the Zoning Atlas - Eno Economic Development District (EDD) Area Land Use
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
ORD-2012-037 (Not Approved) An Ordianance Denying Amendment to the Orange Co8unty Zoning Atlas for EDD
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-075 Resolution Amending the 2030 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-077 Resolution Concerning Statement of Consistency of a Proposed Zoning Atlas Amendment with the Adopted Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-078 NO ACTION - Resolution Concerning Statement of Inconsistency of a Proposed Zoning Atlas Amendment With the Adopted Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
63 <br /> 1 Darcy Willson said that one of the things that concern him is that some residential areas <br /> 2 have been removed and others have not. He said that this does not seem fair. He said that he <br /> 3 would like to be removed as well. He said that the negative financial and social impacts to area <br /> 4 residents are too great to allow this zoning change to move forward. He said that this zoning <br /> 5 change will greatly reduce the buffer between new non-residential development and existing <br /> 6 small residential properties. He said that by incorporating the small residential properties, it will <br /> 7 reduce the required buffers from the current 100 feet to as little as 25 feet. He said that the tax <br /> 8 value of the residential properties will go up and many people will be unable to afford the <br /> 9 increases. The areas affected by this change have a high percentage of affordable housing. <br /> 10 He said that the Eno economic Development District Small Area Plan states that"development <br /> 11 in the Eno Economic Development District is intended to occur under Orange County <br /> 12 development regulations with coordination with the City of Durham." The interlocal agreement <br /> 13 between Orange County and the City of Durham for construction and operation of water and <br /> 14 sewer facilities in the Eno Economic Development zone of Orange County does not include <br /> 15 provisions for this to occur. He said that it needs to be amended so that it complies with the <br /> 16 Eno Economic Development Small Area Plan regarding this matter. <br /> 17 Babette Brown lives in Weldon Ridge and her house backs up on Old NC 10. She said <br /> 18 that she is here to voice her concern about the proposed zoning changes. She said that they <br /> 19 moved here because of the rural character and the great school system. She is worried that the <br /> 20 entire character of the area will change, particularly on Old NC 10. She referred to the letter <br /> 21 from Ms. Kelsey (??), which the County Commissioners received. She said that she supports <br /> 22 the points on the character of the rural residential area. She said that this area does not seem <br /> 23 to fit with commercial development. She said that a lot of this seems to be requested to benefit <br /> 24 one or two large landowners. She said that there seems to be some space to do economic <br /> 25 development north of the railroad tracks. She asked about any legal implications for the County <br /> 26 if the property values decrease. She said that she wonders if Commissioner Yuhasz has a <br /> 27 conflict of interest because he also does work for the largest landowner, who was his largest <br /> 28 contributor. He said that one of his other contributors owns Cardesec, the business. <br /> 29 Jim Brown said that he agrees with his wife, Babette Brown. He made reference to the <br /> 30 access to 1-85 and NC 86 and said that this property has not been used. He made reference to <br /> 31 the impact of high speed rail, which will use the existing tracks. This rail will bisect EDD. He <br /> 32 asked if this has been taken into account. <br /> 33 Sarah Glass lives in Weldon Ridge also and has lived there for about a year. She spoke <br /> 34 about the rural character and the close proximity to places like RTP, Duke, Durham, etc. She <br /> 35 said that at the time the house backing up to Old NC 10 was not a big issue. She said that she <br /> 36 did call someone before they bought the house and was assured that there was not going to be <br /> 37 any changes happening around this area in the near future. She said that the Planning Board <br /> 38 has not been forthcoming with information. She said that the negative environmental impacts <br /> 39 need to be explored, especially the species of wildlife. One of the major issues that bother her <br /> 40 is that the proposed changes seem to be driven by some financial interests of a few landowners <br /> 41 in the area. She said that it is not equitable to allow one landowner to benefit at the cost of a lot <br /> 42 of the residents surrounding the area. <br /> 43 Oliver Glass (husband of previous speaker) spoke of the rural character of this <br /> 44 development. He said that the proposed amendments to the zoning and land designation will <br /> 45 take away all of the enjoyment living at Weldon Ridge and negatively impact the future of quality <br /> 46 of life of his family. Environmentally, the amendments will destroy the natural habitat of <br /> 47 numerous wildlife species. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.