Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-06-2012 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Agenda - 09-06-2012 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 09-06-2012 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2016 3:29:08 PM
Creation date
9/11/2012 10:34:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/6/2012
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 09-06-2012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
ORD-2012-036 Ordinance Amending the Zoning Atlas - Eno Economic Development District (EDD) Area Land Use
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
ORD-2012-037 (Not Approved) An Ordianance Denying Amendment to the Orange Co8unty Zoning Atlas for EDD
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-075 Resolution Amending the 2030 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-077 Resolution Concerning Statement of Consistency of a Proposed Zoning Atlas Amendment with the Adopted Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-078 NO ACTION - Resolution Concerning Statement of Inconsistency of a Proposed Zoning Atlas Amendment With the Adopted Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
60 <br /> 1 1. 1981 Orange County Land Use Plan map (Durham's Urban Growth Boundary) <br /> 2 2. 1988-1993 Land Use Elements Updates <br /> 3 3. 1994 Land Use Plan Map Amendments to Economic Development <br /> 4 4. 1994-1996 Stoney Creek Basin Small Area Plan <br /> 5 5. 1996-2001 Water and Sewer Management Planning and Boundary Agreement <br /> 6 (WASM P BA) <br /> 7 6. 2006-2009 Eno EDD Area Small Area Plan <br /> 8 7.a. Orange County/Durham County Utility Service Agreement (2011-2012) <br /> 9 b. BOCC Consensus to proceed with land use amendments to provide consistency with <br /> 10 Orange County Land Use and Durham City Urban Growth Boundary— November 2011 <br /> 11 <br /> 12 OUTREACH MEETING DATES <br /> 13 PUBLIC OUTREACH MEETINGS <br /> 14 FEBRUARY 22, 2012 <br /> 15 and <br /> 16 APRIL 25, 2012 - Pictures <br /> 17 0 Rail looking east from Mt. Herman <br /> 18 0 Industrial opposite Mobile Home Acres <br /> 19 0 Mt. Herman looking north, Caddy Shack on east side, 1-85 Overpass in the distance <br /> 20 0 Mt. Herman looking south, 1-85 in background <br /> 21 0 Stonegate MHP off Mt. Herman with Industrial Warehouse use across road <br /> 22 0 dac Awnings opposite Stonegate MHP <br /> 23 0 Old Hillsborough Road looking east; Whispering Pines on north and some residential <br /> 24 and undeveloped on South <br /> 25 0 Old Hwy 10 from Mt. Herman looking west <br /> 26 0 Old Hwy 10 from Mt. Herman looking east <br /> 27 0 High Power Transmission Substation off of US 70 <br /> 28 Eno Neighborhood Meeting <br /> 29 Citizen Comments <br /> 30 <br /> 31 1. Stoney Creek Basin EDE-1 vs. EDE-2 <br /> 32 The EDE-2 is suggested by staff because of the frontage along 1-85 and its <br /> 33 relative isolation between the interstate, Mt. Herman Church Road, railroad <br /> 34 tracks, and high voltage primary electric transmission lines. The opposite side <br /> 35 (east) of the road is also presently EDE-2. Also to the east is Existing <br /> 36 Commercial zoning (EC-5). <br /> 37 <br /> 38 2. Resource Protection Areas (RPA) <br /> 39 RPAs are a layer of the land use plan and are still operational in the Unified <br /> 40 Development Ordinance (UDO) to protect environmental areas (i.e. stream buffers, <br /> 41 steep slopes, etc.). <br /> 42 <br /> 43 3. What is light industrial; compare Orange County and Durham County? <br /> 44 The uses were discussed during the Eno EDD SAP meetings and comparability was <br /> 45 achieved. Uses are not of the higher impact industrial. List of specific uses were <br /> 46 added to webpage. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.