Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-06-2012 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Agenda - 09-06-2012 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 09-06-2012 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2016 3:29:08 PM
Creation date
9/11/2012 10:34:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/6/2012
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 09-06-2012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
ORD-2012-036 Ordinance Amending the Zoning Atlas - Eno Economic Development District (EDD) Area Land Use
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
ORD-2012-037 (Not Approved) An Ordianance Denying Amendment to the Orange Co8unty Zoning Atlas for EDD
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-075 Resolution Amending the 2030 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-077 Resolution Concerning Statement of Consistency of a Proposed Zoning Atlas Amendment with the Adopted Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-078 NO ACTION - Resolution Concerning Statement of Inconsistency of a Proposed Zoning Atlas Amendment With the Adopted Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
51 <br /> • Services * <br /> • Transportation <br /> • Miscellaneous <br /> EDE-1 Doesn't Allow: <br /> • Agricultural <br /> • Construction <br /> • Information <br /> • Manufacturing, Assembly& Processing <br /> • Recreation <br /> • Wholesale Trade <br /> • Economic Development Eno Higher Intensity (EDE-2) <br /> EDE-2 Allows: <br /> • Agricultural <br /> • Construction <br /> • Finance <br /> • Government <br /> • Manufacturing, Assembly & Processing <br /> • Retail <br /> • Services <br /> • Transportation <br /> • Wholesale Trade <br /> EDE-2 Doesn't Allow: <br /> • Information <br /> • Recreation <br /> • Residential <br /> Recommendations <br /> 1. Receive the proposal to amend: <br /> a. Land Use <br /> b. Zoning <br /> 2. Conduct the Public Hearing and receive public, BOCC and Planning Board comments, <br /> 3. Refer the matter to Planning Board to be returned for BOCC action by April 17, 2012, <br /> 4. Adjourn the Public Hearing until April 17, 2012 to receive any written comments between <br /> February 27, 2012 and Planning Board recommendation. <br /> Eno Neighborhood Meeting <br /> Citizen Comments <br /> 1. Stoney Creek Basin EDE-1 vs. EDE-2 <br /> The EDE-2 is suggested by staff because of the frontage along 1-85 and its relative <br /> isolation between the interstate, Mt. Herman Church Road, railroad tracks, and high <br /> voltage primary electric transmission lines. The opposite side of the road is also <br /> EDE-2. <br /> 2. Resource Protection Areas (RPA) <br /> RPAs are a layer of the land use plan and are still operational. <br /> 3. What is light industrial compare Orange County and Durham County? <br /> The uses were discussed during the Eno EDD SAP meetings and comparability was <br /> achieved. <br /> 4. Why now? Public utilities <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.