Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-06-2012 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Agenda - 09-06-2012 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 09-06-2012 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2016 3:29:08 PM
Creation date
9/11/2012 10:34:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/6/2012
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 09-06-2012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
ORD-2012-036 Ordinance Amending the Zoning Atlas - Eno Economic Development District (EDD) Area Land Use
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
ORD-2012-037 (Not Approved) An Ordianance Denying Amendment to the Orange Co8unty Zoning Atlas for EDD
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-075 Resolution Amending the 2030 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-077 Resolution Concerning Statement of Consistency of a Proposed Zoning Atlas Amendment with the Adopted Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-078 NO ACTION - Resolution Concerning Statement of Inconsistency of a Proposed Zoning Atlas Amendment With the Adopted Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
50 <br /> problematic areas and identify potential soliitinns to allow the Board to see the pro and con <br /> impact. Also, identify where there could he methods where we could modify what is being <br /> propoccd to addrecc a roal life scenario and at the same time, encohragP any new development <br /> • -• _ • •..._ •• _•.- -• • ••- • <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> ( - • _ •• - • - • - _ •-• • • - •• — • _••• •••_ 0•11.011 • — ) <br /> s <br /> A motion was made by Chair Pelllssler, sPrnnded by Commissioner Foushee to adjourn <br /> •- • • • ••• • • 11 - 1 •• • •- • - - - . 1• . -• a- . 11.10 i•.rd's• <br /> recommendation and any submitted written comments. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 2. Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map and Zoning Atlas Amendments — To <br /> review government-initiated amendments to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use <br /> Map and to the Zoning Atlas to change the land use classification of approximately 493.5 <br /> acres in the vicinity of the Interstate 85/US Highway 70 interchange (in the vicinity of the <br /> Eno Economic Development District near the eastern county line) and to change the <br /> zoning district of approximately 351.5 acres of property in the same area <br /> Craig Benedict made a PowerPoint presentation. He said that last Wednesday, the County <br /> held an outreach meeting and it was very robust. It was a wonderful facility. There were also <br /> planners from the City of Durham at the meeting because this area is within the Urban Growth <br /> Boundary. <br /> Orange County <br /> Quarterly Public Hearing <br /> February 27, 2012 <br /> Agenda Item C-2 <br /> Eno Township and Economic Development Area <br /> Land Use and Zoning Amendments <br /> • Stoney Creek Basin Planning Area <br /> Stoney Creek Basin Small Area Plan <br /> Land Use Intensity Categories <br /> Higher Intensity Areas: <br /> These areas are generally synonymous with the ten and twenty year transition areas in <br /> the existing Land Use Plan (adopted 1981, amended 1988) or they are adjacent to areas <br /> proposed for future development on an urban scale. At some future date, they will most likely <br /> be incorporated into the municipalities of Hillsborough and Durham through the annexation <br /> process. A mix of land uses is possible in these areas and they will be served by water and <br /> sewer. They could be viewed as "receiving areas"for lower density areas to the south. <br /> Economic Development Eno Lower Intensity(EDE-1) <br /> EDE-1 Allows: <br /> • Finance <br /> • Government <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.