Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-06-2012 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Agenda - 09-06-2012 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 09-06-2012 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2016 3:29:08 PM
Creation date
9/11/2012 10:34:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/6/2012
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 09-06-2012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
ORD-2012-036 Ordinance Amending the Zoning Atlas - Eno Economic Development District (EDD) Area Land Use
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
ORD-2012-037 (Not Approved) An Ordianance Denying Amendment to the Orange Co8unty Zoning Atlas for EDD
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-075 Resolution Amending the 2030 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-077 Resolution Concerning Statement of Consistency of a Proposed Zoning Atlas Amendment with the Adopted Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-078 NO ACTION - Resolution Concerning Statement of Inconsistency of a Proposed Zoning Atlas Amendment With the Adopted Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
43 <br /> The Orange County officials have a difficult decision to make. Your support will be invaluable in <br /> helping the planning department and the commissioners to make an obvious and wise decision. <br /> It seems obvious that environmental degradation in the form of stormwater runoff pollution <br /> "adversely impacts aquatic ecosystems, poses human health risks, and can greatly increase the <br /> cost of treating our drinking water". This zoning change to allow greater industrial development <br /> on the assumption that it might generate additional tax dollars sounds like a poor risk and a big <br /> mistake <br /> I close with a direct quote from the Orange County website: <br /> A statement of"Environmental Responsibility in County Government" was adopted as an <br /> Orange County Goal, December 5, 2005. The goal statement reads as follows: "Perform all <br /> County governmental functions, both internal and external, with a sensitivity and ethic that <br /> promotes environmental responsibility and leadership, and an understanding of the actions of <br /> government activities as they affect the natural and cultural resources of the County, region, <br /> state, nation and world." <br /> Thank you for your concern, your consideration, and your help. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Charles P. Gunter <br /> P.O. Box 507 <br /> Hillsborough, NC 27278 <br /> Cc: Stoney CreekâOld NC 10 Property Owner's Association <br /> Mr. Frank Clifton, Orange County Manager <br /> Orange County Commissioners <br /> Orange County Planning Department <br /> Eno River Association <br /> Enclosures <br /> Page 3 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.