Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-11-2012 - 1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Agenda - 09-11-2012 - Work Session
>
Agenda - 09-11-2012 - 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2016 11:41:14 AM
Creation date
9/11/2012 8:26:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/11/2012
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
1
Document Relationships
Minutes 09-11-2012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
17 <br /> Op xati nal j sus Sta fi L :. r i <br /> As previously noted, Orange County's IT staffing levels are roughly half the size of comparable <br /> counties in North Carolina. The under-resourced department is a major concern for current and <br /> future project success. While the IT department has accomplished a substantial amount of work with <br /> the limited staff, most projects take longer than would be ideal due to time constraints and pressures <br /> due to the under-resourcing. Additionally, many critical projects that focus on internal efficiencies, <br /> security, and improved functionalities for County staff are not able to be implemented due to the <br /> staffing limitations. Staffing levels must be increased to undertake the recommendations laid forth in <br /> this plan. The following chart provides a comparison of staff sizes for reference and specific position <br /> recommendations are noted under Section 4. <br /> pouu u�ll 1111 i iuuui pouu 0 .1 loll <br /> I 11111111111111111111111111111111111 <br /> 11111111 111111I111111111 11111111111111111111111111111 <br /> 11T1111190 111111111T q u o el per Ing TOtal Cabarrus 21 FTEs $1.678 million $1.875 million $3.56 million None noted <br /> Catawba 27 FTEs $1.586 million $1.948 million $3.534 $1.1 million <br /> million (licensing and <br /> upgrades) <br /> Durham 33 FTEs $2.6 million $1.07 million $4.39 million $1.7 million <br /> (lifecycle <br /> replacement for <br /> IT equipment) <br /> Pitt 32 FTEs $2.342 million $895,402 (MIS) $3.3285 Fluctuates <br /> (MIS) + +$219,103 million (MIS) between <br /> $299,013 (GIS)=$1.115 million + $538,103 ^'$100K-$500K <br /> (GIS)=$2.64 (GIS)=$3.867 annually for <br /> million million loans for <br /> equipment <br /> Orange 14.7 FTEs (4 $1.193 million $920,260 $2.113 $500,000 <br /> are GIS, 10.7 million (lifecycle <br /> are IT replacements) <br /> specific) <br /> Notes: <br /> • Catawba: IT Department also oversees the Communications Center/E-911 but those staff <br /> counts and budget numbers are not included in the chart above. <br /> • Durham: DSS (3 staff), Library (2 staff), Mental Health (6 staff), Sheriff's Department (8 staff), <br /> and Register of Deeds (1 staff) have additional IT staff and IT budget not included in the <br /> information noted above. <br /> • Pitt: IT department supports all county departments; DSS, Public Health, and Sheriff budget for <br /> the majority of their hardware needs (PCs, laptops, printers) in their own budgets so it is not <br /> reflected in IT budget. <br /> 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.