Browse
Search
Minutes - 20060313
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2006
>
Minutes - 20060313
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 2:14:26 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 2:39:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/13/2006
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 03-13-2006-1
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2006\Agenda - 03-13-2006
Agenda - 03-13-2006-2
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2006\Agenda - 03-13-2006
Agenda - 03-13-2006-3
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2006\Agenda - 03-13-2006
Agenda - 03-13-2006-4
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2006\Agenda - 03-13-2006
Agenda - 03-13-2006-5
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2006\Agenda - 03-13-2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Gordan said that she had misgivings about going outside the per pupil <br />funding and that it could cut into the school board's authority. As she read the letters from the <br />school boards, her misgivings increased. She thinks that the most straightforward way to <br />address the item of equity is to use the per pupil mechanism and allow the school boards to <br />have their traditional authority. She said that it would be better for them to respect the school <br />baards' authority and to raise the per pupil to cover their expenses. If the Board does decide to <br />go outside the per pupil funding, then it should be kept to the traditional county functions of <br />health and social services, which would involve positions such as nurses, Student Resource <br />Officers (SROs) and social workers. She said that, if they do this over time, they may cut the <br />school baards' authority and this could be dangerous. She said that if the County <br />Commissioners want to discuss this, she suggests they venture carefully outside the per pupil <br />funding, if they decide to do this at all. <br />Commissioner Foushee said that she would like to entertain the opportunity to keep the <br />discussion open for the possibility of funding health and safety issues outside the per pupil <br />funding. She is struggling with how to move the discussian forward because of the defeat of the <br />referendum of the OCS. She has a question about how to talk about providing additional <br />resources without levying additional taxes. If they are going to talk about increasing the per <br />pupil allocation, then this brings to mind the opportunity to look at Commissioner Cordon's <br />proposal about a supplemental tax. She said that the funding cannot be separated out of the <br />discussian of defining equity. <br />Commissioner Carey asked about the tax that Commissioner Foushee was referring to <br />and if it was a countywide tax and Commissioner Foushee said yes, it was a countywide <br />supplemental tax. <br />Commissioner Gordon said that it was equivalent to an ad valorem tax and both school <br />systems would have to agree. There would still have to be a referendum. It would still be a tax <br />increase. <br />Commissioner Halkiotis said that he visited the Chapel Hill newspaper website recently <br />and now over 3,000 people had voted in the survey about a district tax, and 89°~ of people <br />voted yes, that the people in the southern end of the County would support a district tax for the <br />OCS. He said that this is nothing new. He said that bonds have always been supported by the <br />southern part of the County. He said that there would have to be a tax somewhere. <br />Chair Jacobs said that there has been a downward slope where the State is providing <br />less and less money for schools and the counties are providing more and more money for <br />schools. He said that Commissioner Gordan had asked about information about outside agency <br />funding for school children and they need this again. He said that, by his recollection, four <br />County Commissioners had proposed countywide supplemental school taxes for funding. He <br />said that he knew that the people in one school system could essentially dictate to the other <br />school system if it were put to a countywide vote, and it was a somewhat disingenuous way to <br />accomplish raising taxes. <br />Chair Jacobs said that his sense of the advantage of going outside the per pupil is to be <br />able to fund bath school systems equally. He said that he also remembers that when they had <br />the discussion about nurses that it was pointed out that the OCS had traditionally funded nurses <br />more than the CHCCS. This is the school system that falls shorter in funding its total budget. <br />He said that outside the per pupil funding could work and he would like to see the contract they <br />do have with the nurses. He said if they went this way, it would take three boards to change it. <br />If everyone could agree to stick with health, safety, and welfare, then it could be funded outside <br />of the per pupil. This would free up money for both school systems to apply to other educational <br />purposes. He suggested that they have a venue where the chairs and the vice-chairs of the <br />three boards meet with a mediator and discuss if there is any agreement an funding outside the <br />per pupil on nurses, SROs, etc. If there is interest, then they could look at a contract and bring <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.