Browse
Search
Minutes 06-05-2012
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Minutes 06-05-2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/24/2015 10:59:17 AM
Creation date
9/10/2012 11:58:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/5/2012
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Agenda
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 06-05-2012 - 5a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 06-05-2012 - 5b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 06-05-2012 - 5c
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 06-05-2012 - 5d
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 06-05-2012 - 5e
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 06-05-2012 - 5f
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 06-05-2012 - 5g
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 06-05-2012 - 5h
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 06-05-2012 - 5i
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 06-05-2012 - 5j
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 06-05-2012 - 5k
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 06-05-2012 - 6a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 06-05-2012 - 6b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 06-05-2012 - 6c
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 06-05-2012 - 7a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 06-05-2012 - 7b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 06-05-2012 - 7c
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 06-05-2012 - 7d
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 06-05-2012 - 7e
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 06-05-2012 - 7f
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 06-05-2012 - 7g
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 06-05-2012-13 (1)
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 06-05-2012-13 (2)
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 06-05-2012-13 (3)
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
ORD-2012-003 Amendment to Orange County Code of Ordinances Regarding Weapons
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
ORD-2012-020 Proposed UDO Text Amendment: New Section 6.20: Public Sewer Connection
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
ORD-2012-021 Ordinance Amending the Unified Development Ordinance regarding Rural Economic Development Area Conditional Zoning District
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
ORD-2012-022 Ordinance approving Budget Amendment #9-B - Purchase of Eno River Parking Deck
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-015 Resolution Amending Chapter 18, Article V, Sections 18-151 Through 18-155 of Orange County Code of Ordinances Regarding Weapons
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-051 Resolution approving Motor Vehicle Property Tax Releases/Refunds
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-052 Resolution approving Property Tax Releases/Refunds
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-053 Resolution Authorizing a Special Advisory Referendum on the Issue of Levying a One-Half Percent Local Sales and Use Tax for Public Transportation
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-054 Resolution Authorizing Exchange of Property - Eno River Parking Deck
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chris Weaver said that there is a disparity in paying for transit. Everyone will pay a <br /> sales tax, but the vehicle registration fee is disproportionate to the expenditures. He said that <br /> District 2 pays half the fees and receives token increases in bus services. He asked why the <br /> rural area should pay half and only receive a small percentage of the proceeds. He said that <br /> this tax predominantly serves the 1 St District. He said that this portion of the County voted all of <br /> the County Commissioners onto the Board. He asked the Board to reconsider the great <br /> amount of funding provided by District 2 and the disproportional dispersal of these funds. <br /> Jeff Schmitt agreed with Chris Weaver. He is a resident of Cedar Grove and he said <br /> that his comments would probably be supported by the majority of northern and rural <br /> southwest Orange County. He spoke about the voting strength of the Chapel Hill Township. <br /> He said that the light rail system would not be used by the rural areas of Orange County. He <br /> said that Orange County does not have the population density to use the light rail system. He <br /> said that if this is so needed by Chapel Hill, then Chapel Hill should pay for it and not the entire <br /> County. <br /> Gerry Cohen said that he hopes the County Commissioners would adopt this plan <br /> tonight and place the issue on the ballot. He said that regional transit is good for economic <br /> development. <br /> Harry Johnson is a law student at UNC and a member of Tarheels for Transit. He <br /> asked the County Commissioners to please put this on the referendum and let the citizens <br /> decide. He said that everyone will benefit from this plan because it helps focus development <br /> in areas where it is needed while keeping it away from areas where it is not needed. <br /> Patrick Byker said that he used to be a student at UNC and then worked with Triangle <br /> Transit through the Chamber of Commerce. He then worked at the DATA for eight years and <br /> served on the board as either Chairman or Vice Chair. He said that it was imperative to him <br /> that there be a robust transit connection between Durham County and Orange County <br /> because the two counties are intertwined. He said that this would be a great thing for <br /> economic development. <br /> Dan Jewell is a resident of Durham but for 17 years before that, he was a resident of <br /> Orange County. He is a member of the Durham/Orange Friends of Transit and said that he <br /> worked hard to get this on the ballot in Durham County last year. He said that this is an <br /> investment in the future. He reminded the County Commissioners that they are not voting on <br /> the referendum tonight, but to allow democracy to take its place. <br /> Ed Harrison recognized other Chapel Hill Town Council members: Mayor Kleinschmidt, <br /> Jim Ward, and Penny Rich. He said that he wanted to address one detail on the plan, which is <br /> getting one short sentence on page 7 under "maintaining existing services." He suggested the <br /> following sentence: "support existing services consistent with state law." <br /> Bonnie Hauser spoke on behalf of Orange County Voice and thanked Commissioner <br /> McKee for his evaluation of the Triangle Transit Plan and Commissioner Gordon who insisted <br /> that the plan be transparent. She said that her group supports transit but not this plan and she <br /> said that as long as light rail is part of the plan, they cannot support it. She said that there is <br /> widespread support for commonsense meaningful transit, but as people learn about the light <br /> rail plan, they lose interest and begin to oppose it. <br /> Julie McClintock has been a Chapel Hill resident since 1970. She also served for 12 <br /> years on the Chapel Hill Town Council. She said that there has been a drop off in enthusiasm <br /> for the transit plan because of the amount of emphasis and cost projections on light rail. She <br /> spoke in support of a first rate bus system. She said that the light rail system consumes over <br /> 90% of the cost. She said that the technology of light rail is not suited for this County. She <br /> said that she has serious reservations about endorsing a tax to raise revenue that puts so <br /> much money into light rail. She said that an independent third party should review the cost <br /> projections given by TTA. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.