Browse
Search
Minutes 06-05-2012
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Minutes 06-05-2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/24/2015 10:59:17 AM
Creation date
9/10/2012 11:58:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/5/2012
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Agenda
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 06-05-2012 - 5a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 06-05-2012 - 5b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 06-05-2012 - 5c
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 06-05-2012 - 5d
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 06-05-2012 - 5e
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 06-05-2012 - 5f
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 06-05-2012 - 5g
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 06-05-2012 - 5h
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 06-05-2012 - 5i
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 06-05-2012 - 5j
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 06-05-2012 - 5k
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 06-05-2012 - 6a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 06-05-2012 - 6b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 06-05-2012 - 6c
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 06-05-2012 - 7a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 06-05-2012 - 7b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 06-05-2012 - 7c
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 06-05-2012 - 7d
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 06-05-2012 - 7e
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 06-05-2012 - 7f
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 06-05-2012 - 7g
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 06-05-2012-13 (1)
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 06-05-2012-13 (2)
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 06-05-2012-13 (3)
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
ORD-2012-003 Amendment to Orange County Code of Ordinances Regarding Weapons
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
ORD-2012-020 Proposed UDO Text Amendment: New Section 6.20: Public Sewer Connection
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
ORD-2012-021 Ordinance Amending the Unified Development Ordinance regarding Rural Economic Development Area Conditional Zoning District
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
ORD-2012-022 Ordinance approving Budget Amendment #9-B - Purchase of Eno River Parking Deck
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-015 Resolution Amending Chapter 18, Article V, Sections 18-151 Through 18-155 of Orange County Code of Ordinances Regarding Weapons
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-051 Resolution approving Motor Vehicle Property Tax Releases/Refunds
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-052 Resolution approving Property Tax Releases/Refunds
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-053 Resolution Authorizing a Special Advisory Referendum on the Issue of Levying a One-Half Percent Local Sales and Use Tax for Public Transportation
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-054 Resolution Authorizing Exchange of Property - Eno River Parking Deck
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chair Pelissier made reference to the Implementation Agreement (Attachment 2). She <br /> said that this is the first time that the County Commissioners will be discussing this. It has not <br /> been discussed with TTA or any other parties. The County Commissioners need to provide <br /> some initial comments so that staff can be directed on how to continue. <br /> Commissioner Gordon reviewed the suggested changes to the agreement and referred <br /> to her emails with John Roberts and Craig Benedict below: <br /> John Roberts' responses to Commissioner Gordon's questions are in underline <br /> below: <br /> Throughout the agreement -The correct terminology is vehicle "registration" fee, not "tag" <br /> fee. ill b� �orr��t�de <br /> Page 2, section 3a - What is the definition of"supermajority"? I (�ohn �ob�rt�) ����r�ntl� <br /> d�l�t�d � 2/3 �ot� r�f�r�n�� for th� �u��rrr��i�rit� t�rrr� frorr� rr�� I��t dr�fte It ��n b� <br /> r�in��rt�d if thi� �ro�i�ion i� k��te <br /> Page 2, section 3d - What is the rationale behind the membership of the advisory board which <br /> includes one representative each for Chapel Hill Transit, Hillsborough, and Mebane? That <br /> does not relate to the population distribution in Orange County. Has any consideration been <br /> given to having a representative from Chapel Hill and one from Carrboro? Thi� i� � ���tion <br /> �r�i� in�lud�d �o I (�ohn �ob�rt�) �ill I���� thi� �n���r to hirr�e I r���ll � di��u��ion th�t <br /> th�r� �hould b� �n �d�i�or� �rou�s �nd it �hould in�lud� th� to�n� but I do not r���ll if <br /> rr��rr�b�r�hi� ����ifi�� ��r� di��u���de <br /> Craig Benedict made reference to the board makeup and said that it has been brought <br /> down to a five-member board then back to a seven-member board. The composition includes <br /> two members from the Chapel Hill Transit area, one member from Hillsborough, one member <br /> from Durham, one member from Mebane, two members from Orange County (one from District <br /> 1 and one from District 2). <br /> Commissioner Jacobs made reference to a super majority and suggested having 5 as a <br /> super majority as the Board of County Commissioners. Regarding the composition of the <br /> advisory board, he is in favor of bringing Mebane to the table but it is preposterous to him that <br /> Mebane would have an equal vote to Chapel Hill and Carrboro and the University in this plan, <br /> or that Durham would be advising on the Orange County transit plan partnership. He said that <br /> it would be easier to have 3 partners in Chapel Hill Transit, one in Hillsborough, and two <br /> representatives of the County and make it a six-member board. <br /> All agreed to have 5 as a super majority. <br /> All agreed with Commissioner Jacobs' suggestion for the composition of the advisory <br /> board. <br /> Pages 3, 4, and especially page 7. When and how will the blank spaces on these pages be <br /> completed? � (�ohn �ob�rt�) �o�ition i� TT��hould ���i�t th� �ount� in findin� thi� <br /> inforrr��tione <br /> Craig Benedict made reference to the three elements of the implementation agreement <br /> and how monies are spent on existing and future service. He made reference to page 4, table <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.