Browse
Search
Minutes - 20060209
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2006
>
Minutes - 20060209
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 2:19:21 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 2:38:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/9/2006
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 02-09-2006-
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2006\Agenda - 02-09-2006
Agenda - 02-09-2006-10a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2006\Agenda - 02-09-2006
Agenda - 02-09-2006-5c
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2006\Agenda - 02-09-2006
Agenda - 02-09-2006-5d
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2006\Agenda - 02-09-2006
Agenda - 02-09-2006-5e
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2006\Agenda - 02-09-2006
Agenda - 02-09-2006-5f
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2006\Agenda - 02-09-2006
Agenda - 02-09-2006-5g
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2006\Agenda - 02-09-2006
Agenda - 02-09-2006-5h
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2006\Agenda - 02-09-2006
Agenda - 02-09-2006-5i
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2006\Agenda - 02-09-2006
Agenda - 02-09-2006-5j
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2006\Agenda - 02-09-2006
Agenda - 02-09-2006-5k
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2006\Agenda - 02-09-2006
Agenda - 02-09-2006-5l
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2006\Agenda - 02-09-2006
Agenda - 02-09-2006-5m
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2006\Agenda - 02-09-2006
Agenda - 02-09-2006-6a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2006\Agenda - 02-09-2006
Agenda - 02-09-2006-6b
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2006\Agenda - 02-09-2006
Agenda - 02-09-2006-6d
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2006\Agenda - 02-09-2006
Agenda - 02-09-2006-7a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2006\Agenda - 02-09-2006
Agenda - 02-09-2006-7b
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2006\Agenda - 02-09-2006
Agenda - 02-09-2006-8a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2006\Agenda - 02-09-2006
Agenda - 02-09-2006-9a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2006\Agenda - 02-09-2006
Agenda - 02-09-2006-9b
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2006\Agenda - 02-09-2006
Agenda - 02-09-2006-9c
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2006\Agenda - 02-09-2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Tara Fikes said that they are accepting applications for the use of HOME funds during <br />the month of February. The application is available on the websites of Orange County and the <br />Town of Chapel Hill. <br />Commissioner Carey asked about the timeframe of their proposed request for funds for <br />the property management position. Chair Jacobs suggested plugging this into the budget cycle <br />and putting it on the list of priorities. <br />Delores Bailey said that they were hoping to have it in this year's budget cycle. <br />9. Items for Decision--Regular Agenda <br />a. Voluntary Agricultural District Designation: Ranells-Bergmann Property <br />The Board considered an application from Noah Ranells and Ben Bergmann for <br />certification as qualifying farmland within the Cane CreeklBuckhorn Voluntary Agricultural <br />District. <br />Dave Stancil said that aver 2,Q00 acres are enrolled in this program. One of the biggest <br />challenges over the last several years has been the original rule that provided for an 80-acre <br />minimum lot size. This item is the first to come in under the new rules adopted last year that <br />allow smaller farms to be designated. <br />This is a property of 61 acres located in Bingham Township on Buckhorn Road. It is <br />known as Fickle Creek Farm. This would also be the first farm to qualify in the Cane <br />CreeklBuckhorn Agricultural District. The process far approval involves review by the <br />Agricultural Preservation Board and assessments by the Tax Assessor's office and the natural <br />resource conservation service. The Agricultural Preservation Board considered this at the <br />meeting on January 12t" and recommended the designation of Fickle Creek Farm as certifed <br />qualifying farmland and recommends that it be placed in the Cane CreeklBuckhorn Voluntary <br />Agricultural District. The Board's action would formally place this in the voluntary agricultural <br />district program, which would give the program 2,10Q acres. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Foushee, seconded by Commissioner Halkiotis to <br />certify Fickle Creek Farm as qualifying farmland and designate it as part of the Cane <br />CreeklBuckhorn Voluntary Agricultural District. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />b. Discussion Regarding Inclusion of School Merger Option in School Eguity <br />Considerations <br />Chair Jacobs said that this is an outgrowth of the retreat discussions. The County <br />Commissioners will be discussing school equity issues on February 16t", and they should <br />decide whether or not and how much time to devote to this matter at the work session. He <br />distributed the homework assignment discussed at the retreat, and they also sent this <br />information to the chairs of the school boards, asking them the same questions that the Board <br />answered: What is your definition of equity? What school program aspects would you be most <br />interested in having funded outside of the per pupil allocation for school current expense? And <br />an additional question for the OCS, Do you want more funding? If so, how do you see that <br />coming about? <br />Commissioner Carey said that he had asked the Board to consider this and his position <br />has been clear. He said that they could decide whatever they wish and whether merger needs <br />to be discussed as an element of the equity formula. He said that, regardless of what the Board <br />does, merger would continue to be an element of public discussion related to the equity issue. <br />He hopes that the Board continues to keep it as a possible option or as an element of the equity <br />discussion in terms of school funding. He said that he understands that the Board may not want <br />to continue the discussion of merger, but he does want to. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.