Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-27-2012 - C1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Agenda - 08-27-2012 - Quarterly Public Hearing
>
Agenda - 08-27-2012 - C1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2016 11:22:05 AM
Creation date
8/21/2012 4:16:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/27/2012
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
C1
Document Relationships
Minutes 08-27-2012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
187
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Question: How will adjacent property owners be compensated or assisted by the <br /> developer or the County if their existing wells run dry? <br /> Answer. There was no requirement for the applicant to assume liability for well issues <br /> experienced by adjoining property owners. Many different factors impact well viability. <br /> It would be difficult to definitively prove this project would create problems for adjoining <br /> property owners. <br /> There were numerous comments made about this issue. A local resident indicated she <br /> was very concerned over the possible installation of geo-thermal wells on the these <br /> proposed single-family lots, and on properties throughout the county, and that such <br /> wells were responsible for removing water from the area and destroying existing well <br /> systems. This individual indicated the County should ban the development of such <br /> wells for this project and county wide due to the hazard they create for local residents <br /> and the unnecessary waste of water resources. <br /> There were numerous comments made indicating the community well was a concern for <br /> adjoining property owners and that individual wells should be used on each lot. <br /> Question: Will this development raise property taxes? <br /> Answer. Staff indicated they were not experts on the subject and could not answer <br /> either way but did indicate that there was a report from an appraiser submitted with the <br /> application package indicating the project would not negatively impact property values. <br /> Question: The site plan appears to indicate the existing driveway for the property is <br /> being re-located to accommodate the proposed road. Why? <br /> Answer. To comply with NC DOT road standards. There is insufficient site distance to <br /> allow for the development of a public road at the point where the existing driveway is. <br /> As a result the existing driveway will be abandoned and the road moved to comply with <br /> DOT requirements. <br /> Question. Are there restrictions limiting the size of the house? <br /> Answer. Staff indicated there are regulations requiring a specific amount of open, <br /> recreational, space on Rural Buffer zoned lots but there are no limits on the size of the <br /> house that could be constructed contained within County development regulations. <br /> The applicant showed the various home renderings denoting the architectural style of <br /> the residences that would be built if the project was approved. <br /> There were general comments that the applicant should abandon their plan and develop <br /> a maximum of 10 homes on 5 to 6 acre lots. <br /> Question: How will trees be preserved on the property? <br /> Answer.� The applicant reviewed the land use buffer and landscaping plan denoting the <br /> street tree requirements, the proposed land use buffer around the perimeter of the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.