Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-27-2012 - C1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Agenda - 08-27-2012 - Quarterly Public Hearing
>
Agenda - 08-27-2012 - C1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2016 11:22:05 AM
Creation date
8/21/2012 4:16:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/27/2012
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
C1
Document Relationships
Minutes 08-27-2012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
187
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Erosion/Stormwater Comments <br /> Proposed Dunhill Subdivision <br /> Page 2 <br /> 3. However, based on preliminary calculations completed by Orange County stormwater <br /> staff, it appears that the proposed low density development will be close to these limits. <br /> Total nitrogen may be slightly higher than the limit while phosphorous was just below the <br /> limit. <br /> 4. If the project does exceed the nutrient limits, we prefer that reductions be made on-site <br /> utilizing the proposed stormwater treatment area. <br /> 5. The proposed the 6,000 square foot potential stormwater treatment area appears to be <br /> adequately sized based on preliminary calculations completed by Orange County <br /> Stormwater staff. We prefer that this area ultimately is designed as a stormwater <br /> wetland or bioretention. <br /> 6. As we understand, the roadway stormwater will be conveyed by grassed swales. We <br /> prefer that to the extent practicable the swales be designed as flat-bottomed, trapezoidal <br /> shaped swales. If possible they should be designed as water quality swales with flat side <br /> slopes (5:1), but should be no greater than 3:1. <br /> 7. A common septic area is proposed to serve 3 of the lots; stormwater runoff from <br /> impervious surfaces should not be directed to this area. In fact, concentrated flow should <br /> not be directed across any individual lot's septic field. <br /> O:AAdminstrativeASW Comments Dunhill Subdivsion 08062012.docx <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.