Minutes - 20051121 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

mental health categary. There must be a letter of support for the facilities. A lot of different agencies will have to be involved in this and zoning is just the land use portion of this. The rules are constantly changing at the State level. He said that he probably would not put the codes in the ordinance itself, except to maybe use it as a reference in the office to determine the categories. John Link said that he would urge being cautious prior to changing codes until there is a clear understanding of what is going to happen in mental health and other facilities. He could see that some codes might be created that would prevent some kind of facility from being served by the revenue stream. He said that they should do only what they have to do by some kind of federal regulations. Commissioner Gordon said that she feels a great need far the big picture in trying to adjust the regulations. She made reference to pages 12 and 13 and that definitions are being amended. She is not sure what the State is requiring of the County. She asked for a better overview of what is required. Robert Davis answered several clarifying questions for Commissioner Gordon. Commissioner Jacobs suggested that this be presented to the Planning Board and that Judy Truitt and Nancy Castan attend the meeting where this is presented. Commissioner Gordan said that this was the best effort to respond to a changing situation, but she would like to know the options. She would like a better explanation of what is being required and what the range of responses might be. Jay Bryan asked for another way to present the categary because it is hard to grasp. He does not have a good understanding of how the permitting is done now in the County. A motion was made by Commissioner Jacobs, seconded by Commissioner Gordon to refer the proposed amendments to the Planning Board far a recommendation and returned na sooner than January 24, 2006. VOTE: UNANIMOUS b. Child Day Care Amendments Consideration of amendments to amend the child day care provisions of the Zoning Ordinance to establish consistency with State standards and terminology for day care providers, users of day care facilities, and the general public. Glen Bowles presented this item. He said that these definitions were created back in the 1980's and have not evolved. The State's definitions have evolved and are continuing to evolve. He showed a map of licensed facilities in the County. Several people have made suggestions. Specifically, Lanier DeGrella, Technical Assistance Director of Child Care Services Association wrote an email. He would like to make this email part of the record. He said that mast of the changes proposed have to da with definitions. The exceptions are on page 8 and the proposed changes are in italics. He read the changes. A Family Day Care Home would be one or two children. The next category is a Day Care Home with between 3 and 12 children, which would be reviewed by staff with a site plan. If there were more than 12 children, it would be a Day Care Facility and would require a Class B Special Use Permit. The only real change is the definitions. The Planning Department has definitions that do not quite fit. He said that they would welcome any opinions from the Board and others. Commissioner Jacobs made reference to the letter from the Technical Assistance Director of Child Care Services and said that she refers to an attached document, which was not included. Glen Bowles said that the document was the ordinance and he has made the changes that she painted out. He will share these with the Board and the Planning Board. Commissioner Gordon said that she finds this unsettling and that they do not have the final document that will be referred to the Planning Board. She is not able to make helpful comments yet.