Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-21-2012 - 6d
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Agenda - 08-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 08-21-2012 - 6d
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2016 10:34:34 AM
Creation date
8/17/2012 4:43:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/21/2012
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6d
Document Relationships
Minutes 08-21-2012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
ORD-2012-031 Ordinance Amending the Zoning Atlas - Woods Rezoning
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
ORD-2012-032 Zoning Atlas Amendment - Woods Rezoning
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
002 <br /> Public Hearing Discussion: <br /> • A BOCC member asked why there were instances where zoning designations did not <br /> match up with property line boundaries. <br /> STAFF RESPONSE: This is the result of previous interpretations made by former staff <br /> and County Attorney when individual townships throughout the County were initially <br /> zoned. The rationale appeared to be that the actual, existing, commercial portions of a <br /> given property were zoned to allow for the continued legal operation of non-residential <br /> land uses while keeping the remaining portion of the property zoned residential to prevent <br /> expansion. <br /> The problem is lots are technically non-conforming given the fact required landscaped <br /> buffers are not on-site and these properties are limited with respect to the areas where <br /> the necessary infrastructure (i.e. well and septic) can be placed to address public health <br /> issues. <br /> Eliminating split zoning addresses the majority of these issues. <br /> • A BOCC member asked if there were other instances, throughout the County, where this <br /> was an issue. <br /> STAFF RESPONSE: Staff indicated there were other properties with similar issues <br /> throughout the County. <br /> Planning Board Discussion: The Planning Board reviewed this item at its June 6, 2012 regular <br /> meeting where there was no discussion concerning this agenda item. <br /> Planning Board Recommendation. The Board voted unanimously to recommend approval of <br /> the Woods rezoning request as recommended by staff consistent with the attached Ordinance <br /> (Attachment 3). <br /> Planning Director's Recommendation: The Planning Director recommends approval of this <br /> rezoning based on the following: <br /> 1. The rezoning is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan which designates the <br /> parcels as being located within the Commercial-Industrial Transition Activity Node. <br /> 2. The properties are of sufficient size to be rezoned to the NC-2 zoning designation. <br /> 3. The rezoning is consistent with various Principles, Goals, and Objectives of the adopted <br /> Comprehensive Plan (see section B of Attachment 1). <br /> FINANCIAL IMPACT: This rezoning request has been reviewed by County departments who <br /> have determined that the approval or denial of the request would not create the need for <br /> additional funding for the provision of County services. <br /> RECOMMENDATION: The Manager recommends the Board: <br /> 1. Receive the Planning Board's recommendation, <br /> 2. Discuss the item, as necessary, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.